Comparison Overview

DigitalFusion

VS

CloudSpot

DigitalFusion

6060 Center Drive, Suite 150, Los Angeles, CA, 90045, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

DigitalFusion is LA's premiere digital photographic rental & post-production facility and creator of the cloud-based photography management and workflow solution, DF Studio*. We specialize in state of the art studio and location digital capture, retouching, scanning, printing and archiving. DigitalFusion was founded in 1999 as digital alternative to conventional photo-chemical processes being used by professional photographers. A technological convergence in the areas of scanning, image manipulation and digital printing allowed us to create top of the line post-production process for still photography. Now, as we build on a foundation of post production by adding production services and equipment, digital processing and file delivery, archival and cloud-based workflow and storage services, our mission statement remains the same: "DigitalFusion will always stand next to the photographer throughout the entire photographic process from production, processing, post production to finishing and archival storage to ensure the image is delivered as it was originally envisioned."​ * Read more about DF Studio at www.dfstudio.com

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CloudSpot

Argyle, TX, US, 76226
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 700 and 749

CloudSpot is a software company that makes photographers' lives easier. We allow photographers to deliver images digitally to clients in beautiful galleries through a seamless system that is fast and easy. We're the only company in the segment that was founded by professional photographers and continues to be focused on photographers' needs. Our goal is to eliminate the hurdles of image delivery and to build a community around a product that can support and build our community's businesses and lives.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/digitalfusion.jpeg
DigitalFusion
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cloudspot.jpeg
CloudSpot
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
DigitalFusion
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CloudSpot
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DigitalFusion in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CloudSpot in 2025.

Incident History — DigitalFusion (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DigitalFusion cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CloudSpot (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CloudSpot cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/digitalfusion.jpeg
DigitalFusion
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cloudspot.jpeg
CloudSpot
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

DigitalFusion company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CloudSpot company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CloudSpot company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to DigitalFusion company.

In the current year, CloudSpot company and DigitalFusion company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CloudSpot company nor DigitalFusion company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CloudSpot company nor DigitalFusion company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CloudSpot company nor DigitalFusion company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither DigitalFusion company nor CloudSpot company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither DigitalFusion nor CloudSpot holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither DigitalFusion company nor CloudSpot company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

DigitalFusion company employs more people globally than CloudSpot company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither DigitalFusion nor CloudSpot holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither DigitalFusion nor CloudSpot holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither DigitalFusion nor CloudSpot holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither DigitalFusion nor CloudSpot holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither DigitalFusion nor CloudSpot holds HIPAA certification.

Neither DigitalFusion nor CloudSpot holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N