Comparison Overview

Digital Dogma

VS

ICL Imaging

Digital Dogma

13003 Los Nietos , Santa Fe Springs, California , 90602, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://digital-dogma.com/

With over 50 years experience in label manufacturing, Digital Dogma aims to bring customers fast, high quality, and unparalleled satisfaction when it comes to their printing needs. We operate out of two facilities, with our San Luis Obispo (C.A.), location focusing primarily on the surrounding wineries; and our Santa Fe Springs plant being the central hub of all operations. Focused exclusively on Digital Label printing, we specialize in quick turnarounds with our streamlined approach to sending estimates, order confirmations, and proofing artwork.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

ICL Imaging

51 Mellen St, Framingham, MA, US, 01702
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
https://www.icl-imaging.com

We are a full-service, large format printer and a recognized leader in the field of full color, large format printing and finishing. Our Large Format Printing services include Graphics for: Trade Shows, Corporations, Retailers, Advertising, Museums, Events, Vehicles, Designers, and Architects. We produce Backlit Graphics, Lobby Signage, Fabric Banners, Movie Set Backdrops, Outdoor Signage, Portable Displays, Retail Graphics, Retractable Banner-stands, Vinyl Banners, Custom Wall Coverings, Adhesive Vinyls, Cut Vinyl Letters, Window Clings, Frosted Vinyl, Building Wraps, Construction Barricades, Bus Shelters, and Installations. Our services include; Leading Retailers, Exhibit Builders and Event Planners, Design Firms, Corporations, TV and Radio Stations, Museums, Cruise Ship Lines, and Advertising Agencies.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/digitaldogma.jpeg
Digital Dogma
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icl-imaging.jpeg
ICL Imaging
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Digital Dogma
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ICL Imaging
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Digital Dogma in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ICL Imaging in 2025.

Incident History — Digital Dogma (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Digital Dogma cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ICL Imaging (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ICL Imaging cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/digitaldogma.jpeg
Digital Dogma
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icl-imaging.jpeg
ICL Imaging
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Digital Dogma company and ICL Imaging company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, ICL Imaging company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Digital Dogma company.

In the current year, ICL Imaging company and Digital Dogma company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ICL Imaging company nor Digital Dogma company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ICL Imaging company nor Digital Dogma company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ICL Imaging company nor Digital Dogma company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Digital Dogma company nor ICL Imaging company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Digital Dogma nor ICL Imaging holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Digital Dogma company nor ICL Imaging company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ICL Imaging company employs more people globally than Digital Dogma company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Digital Dogma nor ICL Imaging holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Digital Dogma nor ICL Imaging holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Digital Dogma nor ICL Imaging holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Digital Dogma nor ICL Imaging holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Digital Dogma nor ICL Imaging holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Digital Dogma nor ICL Imaging holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References