Comparison Overview

4future.social / Digital Society

VS

TPI Aspen Forum

4future.social / Digital Society

Graben 17 Top 10, Vienna, 1010, AT
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Digital Society is a nonprofit NGO. Founded 2015 - Digital Society has the aim is to make the digital world a better place. Our motto is “changing the digital world together …”. Our members are Individuals, other Institutions and Corporations. Our geographical focus is Austria as well as the European Union. Digital Society is working in the areas of Privacy, Data Protection, Copyright and Government Transparency. Our goal is to strengthen the rights of European consumers as well as the position of the digital economy. From our perspective those two things have to go hand in hand and are not contradictions. Only if the consumers and corporations alike have a high confidence in cloud services the technology will be able to advance in the right direction.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

TPI Aspen Forum

None
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

This premier event gathers leaders from business, government and academia to discuss and debate key public policy issues affecting innovation, technology, and communications. ​ Since 2010, more than 850 policymakers and thought leaders have convened at the St. Regis resort for provocative discussions and riveting keynotes on topics including U.S. competitiveness and innovation, broadband penetration, and entertainment distribution models, to name a few. Each year’s agenda touches on timely themes and pertinent issues driving public policy and regulatory decisions and how they may affect tech, communications and content industries. The depth of discussions, featuring both industry leaders and academic experts, makes the event a unique experience.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/digital-society.jpeg
4future.social / Digital Society
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tpi-aspen-forum.jpeg
TPI Aspen Forum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
4future.social / Digital Society
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TPI Aspen Forum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 4future.social / Digital Society in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TPI Aspen Forum in 2025.

Incident History — 4future.social / Digital Society (X = Date, Y = Severity)

4future.social / Digital Society cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TPI Aspen Forum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TPI Aspen Forum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/digital-society.jpeg
4future.social / Digital Society
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tpi-aspen-forum.jpeg
TPI Aspen Forum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

4future.social / Digital Society company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TPI Aspen Forum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, TPI Aspen Forum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to 4future.social / Digital Society company.

In the current year, TPI Aspen Forum company and 4future.social / Digital Society company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither TPI Aspen Forum company nor 4future.social / Digital Society company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither TPI Aspen Forum company nor 4future.social / Digital Society company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither TPI Aspen Forum company nor 4future.social / Digital Society company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither 4future.social / Digital Society company nor TPI Aspen Forum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither 4future.social / Digital Society nor TPI Aspen Forum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither 4future.social / Digital Society company nor TPI Aspen Forum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither 4future.social / Digital Society nor TPI Aspen Forum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither 4future.social / Digital Society nor TPI Aspen Forum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither 4future.social / Digital Society nor TPI Aspen Forum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither 4future.social / Digital Society nor TPI Aspen Forum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither 4future.social / Digital Society nor TPI Aspen Forum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither 4future.social / Digital Society nor TPI Aspen Forum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

HedgeDoc is an open source, real-time, collaborative, markdown notes application. Prior to 1.10.4, some of HedgeDoc's OAuth2 endpoints for social login providers such as Google, GitHub, GitLab, Facebook or Dropbox lack CSRF protection, since they don't send a state parameter and verify the response using this parameter. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.10.4.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Langflow versions up to and including 1.6.9 contain a chained vulnerability that enables account takeover and remote code execution. An overly permissive CORS configuration (allow_origins='*' with allow_credentials=True) combined with a refresh token cookie configured as SameSite=None allows a malicious webpage to perform cross-origin requests that include credentials and successfully call the refresh endpoint. An attacker-controlled origin can therefore obtain fresh access_token / refresh_token pairs for a victim session. Obtained tokens permit access to authenticated endpoints — including built-in code-execution functionality — allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code and achieve full system compromise.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in xerrors Yuxi-Know up to 0.4.0. This vulnerability affects the function OtherEmbedding.aencode of the file /src/models/embed.py. Performing manipulation of the argument health_url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The patch is named 0ff771dc1933d5a6b78f804115e78a7d8625c3f3. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The vendor responded with a vulnerability confirmation and a list of security measures they have established already (e.g. disabled URL parsing, disabled URL upload mode, removed URL-to-markdown conversion).

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Rarlab RAR App up to 7.11 Build 127 on Android. This affects an unknown part of the component com.rarlab.rar. Such manipulation leads to path traversal. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Attacks of this nature are highly complex. It is indicated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. Upgrading to version 7.20 build 128 is able to mitigate this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor responded very professional: "This is the real vulnerability affecting RAR for Android only. WinRAR and Unix RAR versions are not affected. We already fixed it in RAR for Android 7.20 build 128 and we publicly mentioned it in that version changelog. (...) To avoid confusion among users, it would be useful if such disclosure emphasizes that it is RAR for Android only issue and WinRAR isn't affected."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in ZSPACE Q2C NAS up to 1.1.0210050. Affected by this issue is the function zfilev2_api.OpenSafe of the file /v2/file/safe/open of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. This manipulation of the argument safe_dir causes command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 9.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X