Comparison Overview

Digital Lizard

VS

Piper Verlag

Digital Lizard

2650 Westwood Drive, Las Vegas, 89109, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.digitallizard.com

Digital Lizard is a national digital printer that delivers high-quality, specialty print solutions with unmatched speed and precision. Our strategically located U.S. facilities ensure your materials are printed and shipped within 24-48 hours, meeting your tightest deadlines. Utilizing state-of-the-art printing technology, we provide seamless, end-to-end workflows that maintain brand integrity and consistently impress. Certified by FSC, SFI, and PEFC, our experts are dedicated to producing exceptional products that leave a lasting impression.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 70
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Piper Verlag

München, 80801, DE
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
https://www.piper.de

PIPER Verlag »Ich gehe auf jedes Buch zu, als könnte es ein guter Freund werden«: Mit diesem leidenschaftlichen Bekenntnis zur Literatur schlägt Piper-Verlegerin Felicitas von Lovenberg einen Bogen zu den Anfängen des traditionsreichen Verlags. 1904 aus Liebe zum Buch und zu den Leser:innen gegründet, stand das Ausnahme-Unternehmen aus München von Beginn für die Lust an der literarischen Vermittlung und einem nicht-elitären Verständnis ihrer Adressaten. Begeistertes Unternehmertum, kreativer Mitteilungsdrang und Interesse an Demokratisierung kennzeichneten den Münchner »Jungbuchhändler mit Sendungsbewusstsein« Reinhard Piper, der den Verlag 1904 in Schwabing gründete. 112 Jahre später leitet die profilierte Journalistin, Sachbuch-Autorin und »große Leserin« (DIE ZEIT) Felicitas von Lovenberg den Verlag als glaubwürdige Instanz für Autor:innen und Leser:innen – ein breit aufgestelltes Haus mit rund einhundert Mitarbeitern. Deren engagierte interne Auseinandersetzung mit Schriftstellern, Manuskripten und Themen bringt seit Jahrzehnten ein authentisches Produkt hervor – wenn man die Werke so verschiedener Autoren wie Hannah Arendt, Ingeborg Bachmann, Sten Nadolny, Paul Watzlawick, Margaret Atwood, Heinrich Steinfest, Charlotte Roche, Reinhold Messner und Hape Kerkeling überhaupt als »Produkte« sehen möchte und nicht eher als Anreger von Debatten und Auslöser von Leselust. Oder als – um einige der erfolgreichen Piper-Reihen sprechen zu lassen – Gebrauchsanweisungen, Denkanstöße und Abenteuer der Fantasie? So wie einst Reinhard Piper steht heute Felicitas von Lovenberg für die weltoffene Atmosphäre eines Verlags, in dem jeder Autor seinen Platz und jeder Leser sein Buch finden kann – kurzum »alle Menschen, die mitreden wollen«. Unsere aktuellen Stellenangebote: http://www.piper.de/service/jobs-karriere Impressum: https://www.piper.de/impressum Datenschutz: https://www.piper.de/datenschutz

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 134
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/digital-lizard.jpeg
Digital Lizard
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/piper-verlag.jpeg
Piper Verlag
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Digital Lizard
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Piper Verlag
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Digital Lizard in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Piper Verlag in 2025.

Incident History — Digital Lizard (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Digital Lizard cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Piper Verlag (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Piper Verlag cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/digital-lizard.jpeg
Digital Lizard
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/piper-verlag.jpeg
Piper Verlag
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Digital Lizard company and Piper Verlag company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Piper Verlag company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Digital Lizard company.

In the current year, Piper Verlag company and Digital Lizard company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Piper Verlag company nor Digital Lizard company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Piper Verlag company nor Digital Lizard company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Piper Verlag company nor Digital Lizard company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Digital Lizard company nor Piper Verlag company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Digital Lizard nor Piper Verlag holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Digital Lizard company nor Piper Verlag company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Piper Verlag company employs more people globally than Digital Lizard company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Digital Lizard nor Piper Verlag holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Digital Lizard nor Piper Verlag holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Digital Lizard nor Piper Verlag holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Digital Lizard nor Piper Verlag holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Digital Lizard nor Piper Verlag holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Digital Lizard nor Piper Verlag holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References