Comparison Overview

Digital Labels

VS

Capital Printing Corporation

Digital Labels

Amman, JO
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.digitallabels.net

Digital labels established in 2004 as label converter specialised in label printing and flexible packaging industry, serving the Jordanian and the regional markets, which came as a result of deep study of both market. Bringing a cutting edge European technology to have new ideas in marketing products to keep up with the technology revolution. Digital Labels outstanding capabilities have been well proven over the past years through unique, challenging opportunities executed with an expanding base of international partners including the most famous technology providers. Digital Labels offers a full portfolio of labeling and flexible packaging services include Self adhesives, Shrink Sleeves and Wraparound.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Capital Printing Corporation

420 South Ave, Middlesex, NJ 08846, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.capitalprintingcorp.com

Capital Printing is a full service commercial printer centrally located in Middlesex, NJ. We pride ourselves on our extensive production capabilities, our commitment to quality and to our extremely competitive pricing structure. Our equipment list, which can be found online (www.capitalprintingcorp.com) includes a state of the art prep department, a robust and flexible press room, and full service bindery complete with die-cutting and inline finishing capabilities. In addition to the capabilities highlighted in the equipment list, we have also earned several very prestigious certifications that reflect our commitment to quality, our employees and to the environment. Below is a list of those certifications: • Women Business Enterprise (WBE) • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) o ISO 9001: 2000 • Forrest Stewardship Council (FSC) • Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) • Community Energy Corporation • G7 Certified • Union Shop

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/digital-labels.jpeg
Digital Labels
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capital-printing-corporation.jpeg
Capital Printing Corporation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Digital Labels
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Capital Printing Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Digital Labels in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Capital Printing Corporation in 2025.

Incident History — Digital Labels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Digital Labels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Capital Printing Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Capital Printing Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/digital-labels.jpeg
Digital Labels
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capital-printing-corporation.jpeg
Capital Printing Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Digital Labels company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Capital Printing Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Capital Printing Corporation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Digital Labels company.

In the current year, Capital Printing Corporation company and Digital Labels company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Capital Printing Corporation company nor Digital Labels company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Capital Printing Corporation company nor Digital Labels company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Capital Printing Corporation company nor Digital Labels company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Digital Labels company nor Capital Printing Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Digital Labels nor Capital Printing Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Digital Labels company nor Capital Printing Corporation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Digital Labels company employs more people globally than Capital Printing Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Digital Labels nor Capital Printing Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Digital Labels nor Capital Printing Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Digital Labels nor Capital Printing Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Digital Labels nor Capital Printing Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Digital Labels nor Capital Printing Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Digital Labels nor Capital Printing Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References