Comparison Overview

DigiPrint Corporation

VS

HP Digital Print

DigiPrint Corporation

4865 Longley Lane, Reno, Nevada 89502, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18

DigiPrint Corporation is a state of the art digital and offset printing company located in Reno, Nevada. We offer complete printing, design, and presorted mailing services. Established in 1991, DigiPrint has grown to be one of the premier printing companies in Northern Nevada. DigiPrint has been voted the "Best Print Shop" in the Reno News & Review poll over seven times.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

HP Digital Print

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17

HP Industrial Print is a division of HP Inc., offering cutting-edge printing solutions and services for the graphic arts and commercial printing industries. We are accelerating the digital transformation of print by ensuring accessibility, agility, security, and sustainability for everyone — empowering print providers to thrive in the Future of Work. With two pioneering industrial printing technologies — Electrophotography (LEP) and Thermal Inkjet (TIJ) — HP Industrial Print enables businesses to adapt to changing market dynamics, diversify across applications, and achieve growth and fulfillment through world-class digital printing solutions. Our vision is to revolutionize the world of industrial print. With a vast network of 8,000 presses deployed worldwide and a strong customer base of 5,500 across 82 countries, HP Industrial Print continues to drive innovation and redefine the industry with solutions that deliver exceptional quality, versatility, and productivity. HP Industrial Print, across the commercial, label, and packaging segments, empowers businesses to unlock their full potential — shaping a future of limitless growth and opportunity.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/digiprint-corporation.jpeg
DigiPrint Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hp-digital-print.jpeg
HP Digital Print
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
DigiPrint Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
HP Digital Print
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DigiPrint Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HP Digital Print in 2025.

Incident History — DigiPrint Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DigiPrint Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — HP Digital Print (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HP Digital Print cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/digiprint-corporation.jpeg
DigiPrint Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hp-digital-print.jpeg
HP Digital Print
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Unquoted Search Path Weakness
Motivation: Privilege Escalation
Blog: Blog

FAQ

HP Digital Print company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to DigiPrint Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

HP Digital Print company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas DigiPrint Corporation company has not reported any.

In the current year, HP Digital Print company has reported more cyber incidents than DigiPrint Corporation company.

Neither HP Digital Print company nor DigiPrint Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither HP Digital Print company nor DigiPrint Corporation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither HP Digital Print company nor DigiPrint Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

HP Digital Print company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while DigiPrint Corporation company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither DigiPrint Corporation nor HP Digital Print holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

HP Digital Print company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to DigiPrint Corporation company.

Neither DigiPrint Corporation nor HP Digital Print holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither DigiPrint Corporation nor HP Digital Print holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither DigiPrint Corporation nor HP Digital Print holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither DigiPrint Corporation nor HP Digital Print holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither DigiPrint Corporation nor HP Digital Print holds HIPAA certification.

Neither DigiPrint Corporation nor HP Digital Print holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L