Comparison Overview

Digiman Studio

VS

Photofusion

Digiman Studio

4690 Longley Ln #124, Reno, Nevada, 89502, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Based in Reno-Tahoe, Digiman Studio blissfully marries the best of all worlds: creativity and attention to detail; family ownership and consummate professionalism; keen vision and precise execution; and ultimately, award-winning photography and award-winning videography. It’s rather fitting, as the heart and soul of Digiman Studio is the talented husband-and-wife team of Frank Haxton and Becky Murway. Our decades of experience working with businesses across a wide variety of industries, and all throughout the United States, have taught us a few things. For starters, we’ve learned that with client collaboration comes a killer finished product. Always. And with a commitment to both quality work and real value come longstanding client relationships—something we deeply cherish. Our people-centric ways, proven creative process and finely tuned skills allow our clients to put their best selves comfortably forward. We are excited to work together to help you do the same.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Photofusion

2 Beehive Place, London, SW9 7QR, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Photofusion is a powerhouse of emerging talent, uplifting the next generation of visual storytellers. Over the last 33 years it has nurtured generations of diverse creatives through essential free access to photography training, facilities, mentoring and exhibition opportunities from their resource centre in the heart of Brixton, one of South London’s most diverse, and disadvantaged, boroughs.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/digiman-studio.jpeg
Digiman Studio
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/photofusion-photography-centre.jpeg
Photofusion
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Digiman Studio
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Photofusion
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Digiman Studio in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Photofusion in 2025.

Incident History — Digiman Studio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Digiman Studio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Photofusion (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Photofusion cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/digiman-studio.jpeg
Digiman Studio
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/photofusion-photography-centre.jpeg
Photofusion
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Digiman Studio company and Photofusion company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Photofusion company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Digiman Studio company.

In the current year, Photofusion company and Digiman Studio company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Photofusion company nor Digiman Studio company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Photofusion company nor Digiman Studio company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Photofusion company nor Digiman Studio company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Digiman Studio company nor Photofusion company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Digiman Studio nor Photofusion holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Digiman Studio company nor Photofusion company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Photofusion company employs more people globally than Digiman Studio company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Digiman Studio nor Photofusion holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Digiman Studio nor Photofusion holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Digiman Studio nor Photofusion holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Digiman Studio nor Photofusion holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Digiman Studio nor Photofusion holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Digiman Studio nor Photofusion holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N