Comparison Overview

dianepontesaia

VS

Hartless Graphics

dianepontesaia

Wrentham, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

Graphic design, web design, email marketing, web development and marketing materials for business. Graphic designer with 30 years of progressively responsible experience as a design professional. Strong conceptual, design, drawing/comping and pre-press/production skills. Extensive knowledge of the printing process. Excellent MAC and PC skills; proficient in Quark Express, Adobe Photoshop, Adobe Illustrator, Adobe Acrobat, Adobe InDesign and web development applications, HTML, XHTML, CSS, Dreamweaver, Flash, Javascript.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Hartless Graphics

None
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Hartless Graphics is a Graphic Design freelance business for Michael Hartless. There are many facets of Graphic Design which Hartless Graphics covers in print design and digital design such as: Book design, Posters, Illustrations, Brochures, Flyers, Business cards, Advertising, Typography, CD design, Corporate branding Web site design, Digital illustration Image manipulation/ Retouching

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dianepontesaia.jpeg
dianepontesaia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hartless-graphics.jpeg
Hartless Graphics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
dianepontesaia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hartless Graphics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for dianepontesaia in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hartless Graphics in 2025.

Incident History — dianepontesaia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

dianepontesaia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hartless Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hartless Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dianepontesaia.jpeg
dianepontesaia
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hartless-graphics.jpeg
Hartless Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

dianepontesaia company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hartless Graphics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Hartless Graphics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to dianepontesaia company.

In the current year, Hartless Graphics company and dianepontesaia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hartless Graphics company nor dianepontesaia company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Hartless Graphics company nor dianepontesaia company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hartless Graphics company nor dianepontesaia company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither dianepontesaia company nor Hartless Graphics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither dianepontesaia nor Hartless Graphics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither dianepontesaia company nor Hartless Graphics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both dianepontesaia company and Hartless Graphics company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither dianepontesaia nor Hartless Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither dianepontesaia nor Hartless Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither dianepontesaia nor Hartless Graphics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither dianepontesaia nor Hartless Graphics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither dianepontesaia nor Hartless Graphics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither dianepontesaia nor Hartless Graphics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X