Comparison Overview

Diamondback Technology, Inc.

VS

Alliance (now a part of Merrick & Company)

Diamondback Technology, Inc.

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27

We predict bulk material handling and processing problems while your plant is still on the drawing board or solve material hangup problems in existing plants with economical retrofit recommendations and process modifications. Diamondback Technology's bins, hoppers, blenders, feeders and auxiliary equipment designs are based on sound engineering principles and proven field experience. We are the exclusive source of Dr. Jerry R. Johanson's unique problem-solving designs collectively known as Diamondback Technology. Our company is committed to excellence. We strive to be number one in technology, service and satisfaction.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Alliance (now a part of Merrick & Company)

9011 Arboretum Parkway, Suite 310, Richmond, VA, 23236, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

In 1989, Alliance was formed to meet the engineering, construction management and project management needs of the industrial and manufacturing industries with a focus on highly responsive service. Now with offices across the mid-Atlantic, more than 1000 clients worldwide and more than 90 employees, Alliance is positioned as a go-to brand for specialized engineering services across multiple industry sectors from coast to coast. SERVICES: Engineering | Program Management | Construction Management SECTORS: Industrial & Manufacturing | Food & Personal Care | Energy & Power Generation EXPERIENCE. Our clients are under more pressure to deliver projects on an accelerated schedule, with fewer internal resources and tighter budgetary constraints, than ever before. Alliance helps fill those resource gaps wherever we can - that’s what a true alliance is. Our brand is uniquely positioned to add value upstream and downstream on our clients’ projects so that we can prevent challenges to constructability. In this way, we work to be a comprehensive solutions provider - wherever the market needs of our clients demand a solution. INTEGRITY. As our clients have evolved, Alliance has also always looked for opportunities to do things better. It’s how Alliance expresses its deep commitment to innovating efficiencies in partnership with clients to keep domestic manufacturing strong and competitive. It’s Alliance. It’s who we are. And it’s our promise.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 101
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/diamondback-technology-inc..jpeg
Diamondback Technology, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alliance-engineering-inc-.jpeg
Alliance (now a part of Merrick & Company)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Diamondback Technology, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Alliance (now a part of Merrick & Company)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Diamondback Technology, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alliance (now a part of Merrick & Company) in 2025.

Incident History — Diamondback Technology, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Diamondback Technology, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Alliance (now a part of Merrick & Company) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alliance (now a part of Merrick & Company) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/diamondback-technology-inc..jpeg
Diamondback Technology, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alliance-engineering-inc-.jpeg
Alliance (now a part of Merrick & Company)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Diamondback Technology, Inc. company and Alliance (now a part of Merrick & Company) company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Alliance (now a part of Merrick & Company) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Diamondback Technology, Inc. company.

In the current year, Alliance (now a part of Merrick & Company) company and Diamondback Technology, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Alliance (now a part of Merrick & Company) company nor Diamondback Technology, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Alliance (now a part of Merrick & Company) company nor Diamondback Technology, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Alliance (now a part of Merrick & Company) company nor Diamondback Technology, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Diamondback Technology, Inc. company nor Alliance (now a part of Merrick & Company) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Diamondback Technology, Inc. nor Alliance (now a part of Merrick & Company) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Diamondback Technology, Inc. company nor Alliance (now a part of Merrick & Company) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Alliance (now a part of Merrick & Company) company employs more people globally than Diamondback Technology, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Diamondback Technology, Inc. nor Alliance (now a part of Merrick & Company) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Diamondback Technology, Inc. nor Alliance (now a part of Merrick & Company) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Diamondback Technology, Inc. nor Alliance (now a part of Merrick & Company) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Diamondback Technology, Inc. nor Alliance (now a part of Merrick & Company) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Diamondback Technology, Inc. nor Alliance (now a part of Merrick & Company) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Diamondback Technology, Inc. nor Alliance (now a part of Merrick & Company) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H