Comparison Overview

dialogEDU

VS

FutureLearn

dialogEDU

3111 South Dixie Hwy, West Palm Beach, FL, 33405, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The dialogEDU platform was developed by a worldwide team of content, technology and education experts. The leadership team in West Palm Beach, Florida consists of a diverse team of higher education experts who are passionate about improving educational outcomes and constituent experiences. dialogEDU is a uniquely valuable platform that has been specially made to provide an unprecedented state-of-the-art online learning environment for academic institutions, training organizations, corporations and leading associations. dialogEDU is an intuitive and powerful platform that provides a robust and interactive environment for learning. This ensures an online learning experience with increased effectiveness and productivity. With our able team of experts, dialogEDU provides quality and personalized service for your unique vision, goals, needs and cost using its vast experience in cloud-based (SaaS) learning solutions and continued research and development. Through the flexibility and ease of use, dialogEDU ensures a dynamic online learning experience. With mobile and iPhone applicability, everyone is able to use this platform even while on the move!

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

FutureLearn

20 Tavistock Square, London, England, WC1H 9HQ, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

FutureLearn is a global learning platform with a mission to transform access to education by offering top online courses from the world’s leading universities and brands. From online degrees, microcredentials to short courses, we offer accredited and unaccredited world-class education that is 100% online, on-demand, and social. Our courses allow learners to unlock highly skilled new career paths, and empower themselves to change the world.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 193
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dialogedu.jpeg
dialogEDU
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/futurelearn.jpeg
FutureLearn
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
dialogEDU
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
FutureLearn
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs E-learning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for dialogEDU in 2025.

Incidents vs E-learning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FutureLearn in 2025.

Incident History — dialogEDU (X = Date, Y = Severity)

dialogEDU cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — FutureLearn (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FutureLearn cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dialogedu.jpeg
dialogEDU
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/futurelearn.jpeg
FutureLearn
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

FutureLearn company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to dialogEDU company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, FutureLearn company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to dialogEDU company.

In the current year, FutureLearn company and dialogEDU company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither FutureLearn company nor dialogEDU company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither FutureLearn company nor dialogEDU company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither FutureLearn company nor dialogEDU company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither dialogEDU company nor FutureLearn company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither dialogEDU nor FutureLearn holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

FutureLearn company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to dialogEDU company.

FutureLearn company employs more people globally than dialogEDU company, reflecting its scale as a E-learning.

Neither dialogEDU nor FutureLearn holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither dialogEDU nor FutureLearn holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither dialogEDU nor FutureLearn holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither dialogEDU nor FutureLearn holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither dialogEDU nor FutureLearn holds HIPAA certification.

Neither dialogEDU nor FutureLearn holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

HedgeDoc is an open source, real-time, collaborative, markdown notes application. Prior to 1.10.4, some of HedgeDoc's OAuth2 endpoints for social login providers such as Google, GitHub, GitLab, Facebook or Dropbox lack CSRF protection, since they don't send a state parameter and verify the response using this parameter. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.10.4.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Langflow versions up to and including 1.6.9 contain a chained vulnerability that enables account takeover and remote code execution. An overly permissive CORS configuration (allow_origins='*' with allow_credentials=True) combined with a refresh token cookie configured as SameSite=None allows a malicious webpage to perform cross-origin requests that include credentials and successfully call the refresh endpoint. An attacker-controlled origin can therefore obtain fresh access_token / refresh_token pairs for a victim session. Obtained tokens permit access to authenticated endpoints — including built-in code-execution functionality — allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code and achieve full system compromise.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in xerrors Yuxi-Know up to 0.4.0. This vulnerability affects the function OtherEmbedding.aencode of the file /src/models/embed.py. Performing manipulation of the argument health_url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The patch is named 0ff771dc1933d5a6b78f804115e78a7d8625c3f3. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The vendor responded with a vulnerability confirmation and a list of security measures they have established already (e.g. disabled URL parsing, disabled URL upload mode, removed URL-to-markdown conversion).

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Rarlab RAR App up to 7.11 Build 127 on Android. This affects an unknown part of the component com.rarlab.rar. Such manipulation leads to path traversal. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Attacks of this nature are highly complex. It is indicated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. Upgrading to version 7.20 build 128 is able to mitigate this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor responded very professional: "This is the real vulnerability affecting RAR for Android only. WinRAR and Unix RAR versions are not affected. We already fixed it in RAR for Android 7.20 build 128 and we publicly mentioned it in that version changelog. (...) To avoid confusion among users, it would be useful if such disclosure emphasizes that it is RAR for Android only issue and WinRAR isn't affected."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in ZSPACE Q2C NAS up to 1.1.0210050. Affected by this issue is the function zfilev2_api.OpenSafe of the file /v2/file/safe/open of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. This manipulation of the argument safe_dir causes command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 9.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X