Comparison Overview

Dia Art Foundation

VS

Dynamic Earth

Dia Art Foundation

US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 800 and 849

Established in 1974, Dia Art Foundation is internationally recognized as one of the world's most influential contemporary art institutions. The name "Dia," taken from the Greek word meaning "through," was chosen to suggest the institution's role in enabling visionary artistic projects that might not otherwise be realized because of their scale or ambition. Dia's founders, Heiner Friedrich and Philippa de Menil, wished to extend the boundaries of the traditional museum to respond to the needs of the generation of artists whose work matured and became prominent during the 1960s and 1970s. Ever since, Dia's mission has been to commission, support, and present site-specific long-term installations and single-artists exhibitions to the public.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 130
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Dynamic Earth

112 Holyrood Road, Edinburgh, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Dynamic Earth is Edinburgh's world-class Earth Science Centre and Planetarium, telling the incredible story of planet Earth from beginning to mend. With our interactive and immersive exhibition and the UK's only 6K planetarium, we take our visitors on a journey from the very beginning of time to the ecological and climate issues we now face. As a charitable trust Dynamic Earth is driven by a positive belief that people of all ages and backgrounds can be the problem-solvers of the future. We provide outstanding and compelling science engagement to schools, community groups and the public, across Scotland and beyond. Dynamic Earth is also perfectly suited as a contemporary conference or corporate entertaining venue. Offering facilities for a range of events from intimate meetings which overlook the extinct volcano Arthur’s Seat, to gala dinners for up to 550 guests, it’s the ideal unique venue, supporting our charitable mission.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 103
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dia-art-foundation.jpeg
Dia Art Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/our-dynamic-earth-dynamic-earth-enterprises-ltd-dynamic-earth-charitable-trust-.jpeg
Dynamic Earth
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dia Art Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Dynamic Earth
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dia Art Foundation in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dynamic Earth in 2026.

Incident History — Dia Art Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dia Art Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Dynamic Earth (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dynamic Earth cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dia-art-foundation.jpeg
Dia Art Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/our-dynamic-earth-dynamic-earth-enterprises-ltd-dynamic-earth-charitable-trust-.jpeg
Dynamic Earth
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Dia Art Foundation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dynamic Earth company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Dynamic Earth company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dia Art Foundation company.

In the current year, Dynamic Earth company and Dia Art Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Dynamic Earth company nor Dia Art Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Dynamic Earth company nor Dia Art Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Dynamic Earth company nor Dia Art Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dia Art Foundation company nor Dynamic Earth company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dia Art Foundation nor Dynamic Earth holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Dia Art Foundation company nor Dynamic Earth company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Dia Art Foundation company employs more people globally than Dynamic Earth company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Dia Art Foundation nor Dynamic Earth holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dia Art Foundation nor Dynamic Earth holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dia Art Foundation nor Dynamic Earth holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dia Art Foundation nor Dynamic Earth holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dia Art Foundation nor Dynamic Earth holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dia Art Foundation nor Dynamic Earth holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N