Comparison Overview

DHL Supply Chain

VS

Transnet SOC Ltd

DHL Supply Chain

Charles-de-Gaulle-Str. 20, Bonn, DE, 53113
Last Update: 2025-11-24

As the world’s largest contract logistics specialist, we create competitive advantage for customers through customized logistics solutions based on globally standardized warehousing, transportation and integrated services components. We bring sector expertise, global scale and local knowledge to design and manage supply chains from raw materials and manufacturing to finished goods delivery and return services.

NAICS: 47
NAICS Definition: Transportation and Warehousing
Employees: 65,105
Subsidiaries: 27
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Transnet SOC Ltd

138 Eloff Street, Johannesburg, Gauteng, ZA, 2001
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

As the custodian of ports, rail and pipelines, Transnet’s objective is to ensure a globally competitive freight system that enables sustained growth and diversification of the country’s economy. As a state-owned company, Transnet continues to leave an indelible mark on the lives of all South Africans. With a geographical footprint that covers our entire country, Transnet is inextricably involved in all aspects of life in South Africa. Through the Transnet Foundation - which is the Corporate Social Investment arm of Transnet - we have invested time and money in several diverse programmes around the country that provide much-needed succour to our communities. Looking ahead, Transnet is focused on modernizing infrastructure, driving growth, and enhancing efficiency through strategic partnerships. Our vision is clear: to contribute meaningfully to South Africa’s economic aspirations through sustainable growth and modernization.

NAICS: 47
NAICS Definition: Transportation and Warehousing
Employees: 26,735
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dhl-supply-chain.jpeg
DHL Supply Chain
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transnet-soc-ltd.jpeg
Transnet SOC Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
DHL Supply Chain
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Transnet SOC Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DHL Supply Chain in 2025.

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transnet SOC Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — DHL Supply Chain (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DHL Supply Chain cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Transnet SOC Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transnet SOC Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dhl-supply-chain.jpeg
DHL Supply Chain
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transnet-soc-ltd.jpeg
Transnet SOC Ltd
Incidents

Date Detected: 07/2021
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2021
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: financial gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

DHL Supply Chain company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Transnet SOC Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Transnet SOC Ltd company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas DHL Supply Chain company has not reported any.

In the current year, Transnet SOC Ltd company and DHL Supply Chain company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Transnet SOC Ltd company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while DHL Supply Chain company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Transnet SOC Ltd company nor DHL Supply Chain company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Transnet SOC Ltd company nor DHL Supply Chain company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither DHL Supply Chain company nor Transnet SOC Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither DHL Supply Chain nor Transnet SOC Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

DHL Supply Chain company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Transnet SOC Ltd company.

DHL Supply Chain company employs more people globally than Transnet SOC Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage.

Neither DHL Supply Chain nor Transnet SOC Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither DHL Supply Chain nor Transnet SOC Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither DHL Supply Chain nor Transnet SOC Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither DHL Supply Chain nor Transnet SOC Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither DHL Supply Chain nor Transnet SOC Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither DHL Supply Chain nor Transnet SOC Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H