Comparison Overview

DHInfrastructure

VS

Action Research

DHInfrastructure

9 1/2 Market Street, Northampton, 01060, US
Last Update: 2025-11-24
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.dhinfrastructure.com

DHInfrastructure advises governments, multi-lateral development banks, and private companies on matters related to the energy, water, transport, and telecommunications industries. We help our clients apply principles of economics and finance to public policy, regulation, litigation of disputes, and infrastructure acquisitions. Our team has advised clients in more than thirty countries throughout the Americas, Africa, South Asia, and the former Soviet Union.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Action Research

318 5th Street, Brooklyn, NY, 11215, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749
http://www.actionresearch.io

Action Research works with child welfare systems across the country, providing information, analysis, and support to illuminate paths to better outcomes for children, youth, and families. We partner with government leaders, front-line staff, think tanks, service providers, and foundations to generate insight and drive system reform. We are nationally recognized for our child welfare expertise and for producing innovative research to drive decision-making.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dhinfrastructure.jpeg
DHInfrastructure
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/action-research-partners.jpeg
Action Research
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
DHInfrastructure
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Action Research
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DHInfrastructure in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Action Research in 2025.

Incident History — DHInfrastructure (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DHInfrastructure cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Action Research (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Action Research cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dhinfrastructure.jpeg
DHInfrastructure
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/action-research-partners.jpeg
Action Research
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both DHInfrastructure company and Action Research company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Action Research company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to DHInfrastructure company.

In the current year, Action Research company and DHInfrastructure company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Action Research company nor DHInfrastructure company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Action Research company nor DHInfrastructure company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Action Research company nor DHInfrastructure company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither DHInfrastructure company nor Action Research company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither DHInfrastructure nor Action Research holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither DHInfrastructure company nor Action Research company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Action Research company employs more people globally than DHInfrastructure company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither DHInfrastructure nor Action Research holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither DHInfrastructure nor Action Research holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither DHInfrastructure nor Action Research holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither DHInfrastructure nor Action Research holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither DHInfrastructure nor Action Research holds HIPAA certification.

Neither DHInfrastructure nor Action Research holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References