Comparison Overview

DFI Retail Group

VS

Electrolux Home

DFI Retail Group

11/F Devon House Taikoo Place, 979 King's Road, Quarry Bay, HK
Last Update: 2025-11-26

DFI Retail Group (the ‘Group’) is a leading Asian retailer, driven by its purpose to “Sustainably Serve Asia for Generations with Everyday Moments”. As at 31 May 2025, the Group, its associates and joint ventures operated over 7,700 outlets and employed over 85,000 people. The Group had total annual revenue in 2024 exceeding US$24.9 billion. The Group is dedicated to delivering quality, value and service to Asian consumers through a compelling retail experience, supported by an extensive store network and highly efficient supply chains. The Group, including associates and joint ventures, operates a portfolio of well-known brands across five key divisions: health and beauty, convenience, food, home furnishings, and restaurants. The Group’s parent company, DFI Retail Group Holdings Limited, is incorporated in Bermuda and has a primary listing in the equity shares (transition) category of the London Stock Exchange, with secondary listings in Bermuda and Singapore. The Group’s businesses are managed from Hong Kong. DFI Retail Group is a member of the Jardine Matheson Group.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 7,954
Subsidiaries: 20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Electrolux Home

Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

Electrolux Home grundades 1995 som ett Franchisekoncept, idag består kedjan av 25 butiker över hela Sverige samt e-handel. Electrolux Home är butikskedjan för hela köket och erbjuder kompletta köks- och förvaringsinredningar, vitvaror och ett brett sortiment av utvalda cookshop och småelsprodukter. Kök från JKE och förvaring säljs under det egna varumärket Sentens. Hos Electrolux Home får kunderna hjälp hela vägen: Från inspiration och ritning till leverans, installation, montering och finansiering. Electrolux Home är ett franchisekoncept som ägs av Electrolux-koncernen.

NAICS: 452
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dfi-retail-group.jpeg
DFI Retail Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/electrolux-home.jpeg
Electrolux Home
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
DFI Retail Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Electrolux Home
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DFI Retail Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Electrolux Home in 2025.

Incident History — DFI Retail Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DFI Retail Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Electrolux Home (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Electrolux Home cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dfi-retail-group.jpeg
DFI Retail Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 01/2021
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2014
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Malware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/electrolux-home.jpeg
Electrolux Home
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Electrolux Home company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to DFI Retail Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

DFI Retail Group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Electrolux Home company has not reported any.

In the current year, Electrolux Home company and DFI Retail Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

DFI Retail Group company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Electrolux Home company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Electrolux Home company nor DFI Retail Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

DFI Retail Group company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Electrolux Home company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither DFI Retail Group company nor Electrolux Home company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither DFI Retail Group nor Electrolux Home holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

DFI Retail Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Electrolux Home company.

Electrolux Home company employs more people globally than DFI Retail Group company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither DFI Retail Group nor Electrolux Home holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither DFI Retail Group nor Electrolux Home holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither DFI Retail Group nor Electrolux Home holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither DFI Retail Group nor Electrolux Home holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither DFI Retail Group nor Electrolux Home holds HIPAA certification.

Neither DFI Retail Group nor Electrolux Home holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H