Comparison Overview

DFI-ITOX

VS

Avant Technology

DFI-ITOX

DFI Inc. 100, Huanhe St., Xizhi Dist, New Taipei, Taiwan, 22154, ., undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

DFI-ITOX, with its location at 8 Elkins Road, East Brunswick, New Jersey, is a United States affiliate company of DFI Inc. Founded in 1987, DFI-ITOX is recognized nationwide as a leading supplier of x86 embedded motherboards and single board computers for use in light industrial and special OEM/ODM environments including voice messaging, medical electronics, industrial control, security & surveillance, telecommunications, ATM/POS, digital signage, gaming and kiosk systems. As an independent ISO 9001:2008 registered firm, DFI-ITOX is capable of providing support for both standard and custom-designed products ranging from ATX through Mini-ITX motherboards, small form factor SBCs, and COM modules. DFI-ITOX is committed to supporting customer requirements and continues to provide industrial PC systems/boards incorporating legacy ISA slots, along with PCI, and PCI Express bus support.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Avant Technology

828 New Meister Lane, Building 10 Suite 300, Pflugerville, TX, US, 78660
Last Update: 2025-11-17
Between 750 and 799

Established in 1984 as All Components we are now Avant North America - a leading supplier of computer memory products for the North American market. Headquartered in Austin, TX, we manufacture and distribute Avant memory upgrades - a full range of DDR3, DDR2, DDR and SDR memory module solutions. Avant memory upgrades are built in our world-class manufacturing and testing facility using only the highest quality components. We also offer an assortment of flash memory products and custom module solutions. We specialize in professional sales and account management for a collection of resellers, distributors, system builders, and OEMs nationwide.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 171
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dfi-itox.jpeg
DFI-ITOX
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/avant-technology.jpeg
Avant Technology
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
DFI-ITOX
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Avant Technology
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DFI-ITOX in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Avant Technology in 2025.

Incident History — DFI-ITOX (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DFI-ITOX cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Avant Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Avant Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dfi-itox.jpeg
DFI-ITOX
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/avant-technology.jpeg
Avant Technology
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Avant Technology company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to DFI-ITOX company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Avant Technology company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to DFI-ITOX company.

In the current year, Avant Technology company and DFI-ITOX company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Avant Technology company nor DFI-ITOX company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Avant Technology company nor DFI-ITOX company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Avant Technology company nor DFI-ITOX company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither DFI-ITOX company nor Avant Technology company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither DFI-ITOX nor Avant Technology holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither DFI-ITOX company nor Avant Technology company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Avant Technology company employs more people globally than DFI-ITOX company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Hardware.

Neither DFI-ITOX nor Avant Technology holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither DFI-ITOX nor Avant Technology holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither DFI-ITOX nor Avant Technology holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither DFI-ITOX nor Avant Technology holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither DFI-ITOX nor Avant Technology holds HIPAA certification.

Neither DFI-ITOX nor Avant Technology holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H