Comparison Overview

Deutschland

VS

Tata Group

Deutschland

Hamburg, -, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 700 and 749

Deutschland, Germany. Show more Show less

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tata Group

Bombay House, Mumbai, 400001, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 800 and 849

Founded by Jamsetji Tata in 1868, the Tata group is a global enterprise headquartered in India. The group operates in more than 100 countries across six continents with a mission 'To improve the quality of life of the communities we serve globally, through long-term stakeholder value creation based on Leadership with Trust'​. Sixty-six per cent of the equity of Tata Sons, the promoter holding company, is held by philanthropic trusts, thereby returning wealth to society. The Tata name has been respected in India for 150 years for its adherence to strong values and business ethics. The companies of the Tata group employ the best and finest, strengthened by a culture of ethics and integrity. Today we stand strong at 702,454 employees.

NAICS: 92111
NAICS Definition: Executive Offices
Employees: 981,041
Subsidiaries: 75
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/deutschland.jpeg
Deutschland
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tata-group.jpeg
Tata Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Deutschland
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tata Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Executive Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Deutschland in 2025.

Incidents vs Executive Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tata Group in 2025.

Incident History — Deutschland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Deutschland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tata Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/deutschland.jpeg
Deutschland
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tata-group.jpeg
Tata Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Financial Gain, Disruption
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing Emails, Spoofed Supplier Communications, WhatsApp Scams, Human Error (Misplaced Trust)
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft, Reputational Damage, Exploitation of Human Behavior
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Tata Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Deutschland company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Tata Group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Deutschland company has not reported any.

In the current year, Tata Group company has reported more cyber incidents than Deutschland company.

Tata Group company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Deutschland company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Tata Group company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Deutschland company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Tata Group company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Deutschland company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Deutschland company nor Tata Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Deutschland nor Tata Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Tata Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Deutschland company.

Tata Group company employs more people globally than Deutschland company, reflecting its scale as a Executive Offices.

Neither Deutschland nor Tata Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Deutschland nor Tata Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Deutschland nor Tata Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Deutschland nor Tata Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Deutschland nor Tata Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Deutschland nor Tata Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N