Comparison Overview

Deutsche Hospitality

VS

Minor Hotels

Deutsche Hospitality

Lyoner Straße 25 Frankfurt, Hesse 60528, DE
Last Update: 2025-11-22

Deutsche Hospitality stands for an exceptional portfolio comprising more than 130 hotels in 20 countries on three continents, about 30 hotels are currently under development. Deutsche Hospitality stands for an exceptional portfolio comprising more than 130 hotels in 20 countries on three continents, about 30 hotels are currently under development. The unique and varied Deutsche Hospitality portfolio includes Steigenberger Porsche Design Hotels, Steigenberger ICONs, Steigenberger Hotels & Resorts, MAXX by Deutsche Hospitality, our lifestyle option, Jaz in the City, the IntercityHotels at busy hubs such as railway stations and airports and the Zleep Hotels with quality and design at an affordable price.

NAICS: 721
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Minor Hotels

88 The PARQ Building, 12th Fl. Ratchadaphisek Road, Bangkok, Klongtoey, TH, 10110
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

Minor Hotels is a global hospitality leader with over 560 hotels and resorts across six continents, a diverse portfolio of F&B businesses and a selection of luxury transportation services. With over four decades of experience, we build stronger brands, foster lasting partnerships, and drive business success by staying focused on what matters most to our guests, team members and partners. Our diverse hotel brands - from the luxury of Anantara and Tivoli to the vibrant style of Avani and nhow - bring our guests to the most desirable hotel and resort destinations around the world. We also own a collection of related hospitality businesses, including luxury residences, private jets, restaurants and bars, spa and wellness, and river cruises and rail journeys. #MinorHotels

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 19,509
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/deutsche-hospitality.jpeg
Deutsche Hospitality
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/minor-hotel-group.jpeg
Minor Hotels
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Deutsche Hospitality
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Minor Hotels
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Deutsche Hospitality in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Minor Hotels in 2025.

Incident History — Deutsche Hospitality (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Deutsche Hospitality cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Minor Hotels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Minor Hotels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/deutsche-hospitality.jpeg
Deutsche Hospitality
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/minor-hotel-group.jpeg
Minor Hotels
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Minor Hotels company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Deutsche Hospitality company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Minor Hotels company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Deutsche Hospitality company.

In the current year, Minor Hotels company and Deutsche Hospitality company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Minor Hotels company nor Deutsche Hospitality company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Minor Hotels company nor Deutsche Hospitality company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Minor Hotels company nor Deutsche Hospitality company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Deutsche Hospitality company nor Minor Hotels company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Deutsche Hospitality nor Minor Hotels holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Deutsche Hospitality company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Minor Hotels company.

Minor Hotels company employs more people globally than Deutsche Hospitality company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitality.

Neither Deutsche Hospitality nor Minor Hotels holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Deutsche Hospitality nor Minor Hotels holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Deutsche Hospitality nor Minor Hotels holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Deutsche Hospitality nor Minor Hotels holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Deutsche Hospitality nor Minor Hotels holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Deutsche Hospitality nor Minor Hotels holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H