Comparison Overview

Deutsche Bank

VS

Revolut

Deutsche Bank

Taunusanlage 12, Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, 60325, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Deutsche Bank is the leading German bank with strong European roots and a global network. The bank focuses on its strengths in a Corporate Bank newly created in 2019, a leading Private Bank, a focused investment bank and in asset management. We provide financial services to companies, governments, institutional investors, small and medium-sized businesses and private individuals. Deutsche Bank was founded in 1870 to accompany German businesses into the world, and has worked across borders ever since. Useful links: Jobs https://www.db.com/careers. Netiquette at https://www.db.com/netiquette. Data protection policy https://www.db.com/DataProtection. Imprint https://www.db.com/imprint.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 74,237
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Revolut

7 Westferry Circus, London, England, E14 4HD, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

People deserve more from their money. More visibility, more control, and more freedom. Since 2015, Revolut has been on a mission to deliver just that. Our powerhouse of products help our 50+ million customers get more from their money every day. As we continue our lightning-fast growth,‌ 2 things are essential to our success: our people and our culture. In recognition of our outstanding employee experience, we've been certified as a Great Place to Work™. So far, we have 10,000+ people working around the world, from our offices and remotely, to help us achieve our mission. And we're looking for more brilliant people. People who love building great products, redefining success, and turning the complexity of a chaotic world into the simplicity of a beautiful solution.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 17,316
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/deutsche-bank.jpeg
Deutsche Bank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/revolut.jpeg
Revolut
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Deutsche Bank
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Revolut
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Deutsche Bank in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Revolut in 2025.

Incident History — Deutsche Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Deutsche Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Revolut (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Revolut cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/deutsche-bank.jpeg
Deutsche Bank
Incidents

Date Detected: 07/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Software Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical Access, Logical Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Initial Access Broker
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/revolut.jpeg
Revolut
Incidents

Date Detected: 09/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Revolut company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Deutsche Bank company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Deutsche Bank company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Revolut company.

In the current year, Revolut company and Deutsche Bank company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Revolut company nor Deutsche Bank company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Deutsche Bank company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Revolut company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Revolut company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Deutsche Bank company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Deutsche Bank company nor Revolut company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Deutsche Bank nor Revolut holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Deutsche Bank company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Revolut company.

Deutsche Bank company employs more people globally than Revolut company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Deutsche Bank nor Revolut holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Deutsche Bank nor Revolut holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Deutsche Bank nor Revolut holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Deutsche Bank nor Revolut holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Deutsche Bank nor Revolut holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Deutsche Bank nor Revolut holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N