Comparison Overview

Detroit Opera

VS

Minnesota Opera

Detroit Opera

1526 Broadway, None, Detroit, MI, US, 48226
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Detroit Opera (formerly Michigan Opera Theatre), one of the nation's most vibrant nonprofit arts organizations, aspires to influence the future of opera and dance with a goal of invigorating audiences through new and re-imagined productions, relevant to current times. It is creating an ambitious standard for American opera and dance that emphasizes community, accessibility, artistic risk-taking, and collaboration. Founded in 1971 by the late Dr. David DiChiera, Detroit Opera is led by Patty Isacson Sabee, President and CEO; Yuval Sharon, Gary L. Wasserman Artistic Director; Roberto Kalb, Music Director; and Ethan Davidson, Board Chairman. For more information, visit www.detroitopera.org.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 184
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Minnesota Opera

620 N 1st St, Minneapolis, MN, 55401, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Minnesota Opera, led by President and General Director Ryan Taylor, combines a culture of creativity and fiscal responsibility to produce opera and opera education programs that expand the art form, nurture artists, enrich audiences, and contribute to the vitality of the community. We would like to acknowledge that Minnesota Opera is located on Dakota land. We encourage you to join us in learning about the indigenous people where you are and reflecting on their past, present, and future.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 123
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/detroitopera.jpeg
Detroit Opera
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/minnesota-opera.jpeg
Minnesota Opera
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Detroit Opera
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Minnesota Opera
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Detroit Opera in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Minnesota Opera in 2025.

Incident History — Detroit Opera (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Detroit Opera cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Minnesota Opera (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Minnesota Opera cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/detroitopera.jpeg
Detroit Opera
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/minnesota-opera.jpeg
Minnesota Opera
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Detroit Opera company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Minnesota Opera company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Minnesota Opera company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Detroit Opera company.

In the current year, Minnesota Opera company and Detroit Opera company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Minnesota Opera company nor Detroit Opera company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Minnesota Opera company nor Detroit Opera company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Minnesota Opera company nor Detroit Opera company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Detroit Opera company nor Minnesota Opera company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Detroit Opera nor Minnesota Opera holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Detroit Opera company nor Minnesota Opera company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Detroit Opera company employs more people globally than Minnesota Opera company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Detroit Opera nor Minnesota Opera holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Detroit Opera nor Minnesota Opera holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Detroit Opera nor Minnesota Opera holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Detroit Opera nor Minnesota Opera holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Detroit Opera nor Minnesota Opera holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Detroit Opera nor Minnesota Opera holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N