Comparison Overview

Designer Print

VS

MackPac Branding

Designer Print

Station Road, Pontypool, Torfaen, NP4 5ES, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.designerprint.org

Established in 1984, Designer Print has more than 40 years experience and with a large and varied client base, we cover all aspects of your print, workwear and branding needs. From seeing your ideas take shape with our design team, then making them come alive in beautiful print, impactful large format decals and signs on your building and vehicles, and finishing with high quality embroidered of printed workwear, we have you covered.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

MackPac Branding

1239 Linda Vista Dr., San Marcos, 92078, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
https://mackpacbranding.com

Welcome to MackPac Branding - A division of Mack Packaging, Inc. Powered by American Solutions for Business. Because we offer the broadest array of printing, direct marketing, promotional products and related graphic products and solutions, we are: • A Marketing Agency without any agency fees. • An Addition to Your Staff without being an addition to your payroll. • A Business Process Outsource Resource you can trust MackPac Branding - A division of Mack Packaging, Powered by ASB, is your one source for Total Project Management solutions that improve productivity and reduce costs. We can help manage your communications process from start to finish. Our services include graphic design, print management, product sourcing, inventory management, warehousing, fulfillment and distribution. Whether your project involves a targeted direct mail campaign or an online procurement system, MackPac offers solutions that streamline processes and maximize efficiencies. Our services include: • Multimedia (video production, interactive presentations, digital catalogs) • e Commerce Solutions (online stores, web marketing, online audio/video conferencing) • Promotional Products (trade-show/event giveaways, client & employee gifts) • Apparel & Uniforms (embroidered & screen-printed goods) • Printing Services (commercial printing, point of sale, signage) • Business Documents

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/designer-print.jpeg
Designer Print
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seeds-of-success.jpeg
MackPac Branding
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Designer Print
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MackPac Branding
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Designer Print in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MackPac Branding in 2025.

Incident History — Designer Print (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Designer Print cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MackPac Branding (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MackPac Branding cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/designer-print.jpeg
Designer Print
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seeds-of-success.jpeg
MackPac Branding
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Designer Print company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MackPac Branding company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, MackPac Branding company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Designer Print company.

In the current year, MackPac Branding company and Designer Print company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MackPac Branding company nor Designer Print company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MackPac Branding company nor Designer Print company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MackPac Branding company nor Designer Print company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Designer Print company nor MackPac Branding company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Designer Print nor MackPac Branding holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Designer Print company nor MackPac Branding company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

MackPac Branding company employs more people globally than Designer Print company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Designer Print nor MackPac Branding holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Designer Print nor MackPac Branding holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Designer Print nor MackPac Branding holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Designer Print nor MackPac Branding holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Designer Print nor MackPac Branding holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Designer Print nor MackPac Branding holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References