Comparison Overview

DesignCrowd

VS

LPS Labels

DesignCrowd

2 Hill St, Surry Hills, New South Wales, AU, 2010
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

DesignCrowd (www.designcrowd.com) is a global online marketplace for logo design, graphic design and web design. You can outsource or 'crowdsource'​ any creative project on DesignCrowd - from logo design to website design to t-shirt design - and receive design ideas from over 500,000 designers from around the world! It's a faster, cheaper and more creative way to get the design you're looking for. DesignCrowd also operates BrandCrowd (www.brandcrowd.com) a marketplace for premium logo templates and a leading logo design maker tool.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 714
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

LPS Labels

3937 Westpoint Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC, 27103, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

At LPS Labels in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, we put the benefit of our more than 30 years of labeling products and services into every project. Whether you need a small batch for a special project or ongoing labels for your products, you can count on our dedicate staff to approach your project with passion and professionalism. We understand that your labels are a representation of you and will work diligently to make that image everything you deserve. Our dedication to color management ensures that your colors will be on target and stay true from batch to batch, maintaining the integrity of your brand.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/designcrowd.jpeg
DesignCrowd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lps-labels.jpeg
LPS Labels
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
DesignCrowd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LPS Labels
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DesignCrowd in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LPS Labels in 2025.

Incident History — DesignCrowd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DesignCrowd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LPS Labels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LPS Labels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/designcrowd.jpeg
DesignCrowd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lps-labels.jpeg
LPS Labels
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

DesignCrowd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LPS Labels company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, LPS Labels company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to DesignCrowd company.

In the current year, LPS Labels company and DesignCrowd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LPS Labels company nor DesignCrowd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither LPS Labels company nor DesignCrowd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither LPS Labels company nor DesignCrowd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither DesignCrowd company nor LPS Labels company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither DesignCrowd nor LPS Labels holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither DesignCrowd company nor LPS Labels company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

DesignCrowd company employs more people globally than LPS Labels company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither DesignCrowd nor LPS Labels holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither DesignCrowd nor LPS Labels holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither DesignCrowd nor LPS Labels holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither DesignCrowd nor LPS Labels holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither DesignCrowd nor LPS Labels holds HIPAA certification.

Neither DesignCrowd nor LPS Labels holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X