Comparison Overview

Design Touch

VS

Appelblauwzeegroen Grafisch Ontwerp

Design Touch

None
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Design is about image. Design Touch is about images of success. Since 1986, our graphic design studio has provided the creative touch to make our clients stand out in a crowd. Branding and corporate identity development, capabilities brochures, sales promotion materials, website development – each is custom designed to meet your marketing objectives. As the design principal at Design Touch John Betlejewski believes in a personal touch. There are no intermediaries or account executives. You work directly with a seasoned, commercial designer with over 24 years' experience. Design Touch is innovative, creative, on time, and within budget. Our clients are high-tech, low-tech, and no-tech, in local, national and international markets. Contact us today and let us bring new ideas and awareness to your sales and marketing efforts that will strengthen your position in the marketplace.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Appelblauwzeegroen Grafisch Ontwerp

Soest, nl
Last Update: 2025-11-29

Appelblauwzeegroen Grafisch Ontwerp is het ontwerpbureau van Suzanne van Hattum, in samenwerking met Pim Smit van PMSMT Grafisch ontwerp. Samen staan we sterk voor alle denkbare uitingen op het gebied van grafische vormgeving. Na mijn studie Reclame- en Publiciteitsvormgeving aan het Nimeto in Utrecht ben ik begonnen als grafisch vormgever bij Raadgever en Partners, gelinkt aan Lensink van Berkel in Amersfoort. Hier heb ik me alle ins en outs op het gebied van redactionele vormgeving eigen gemaakt. Na 5 jaar was ik toe aan iets nieuws en heb ik – na kort gewerkt te hebben bij twee andere reclamebureaus – me gerealiseerd dat het me geweldig leek om mijn eigen opdrachten te kunnen aannemen en hier mijn eigen invulling aan te geven. Hier is in januari 2007 appelblauwzeegroen uit ontstaan. De afgelopen jaren heb ik een flink aantal magazines en andere redactionele uitgaven gemaakt, onder andere Spangas magazines, Speel & Lees doeboeken, interne krant voor ING assurantie kantoren, en een drieluik nieuwsbrief voor de relaties van Isoluik bv. Recent heb ik een magazine ontworpen voor de vernieuwing van de winkelstraat in Soest, 3761 Magazine. Dit blad is tweemaal gemaakt in samenwerking met alle ondernemers op de Van Weedestraat in Soest en was een groot succes. Daarnaast verzorg ik al ruim 8 jaar de vormgeving voor Moesson, het Indische maandblad, wat ik met heel veel plezier doe! Naast grafische vormgeving wil ik meer doen met styling, interieur en illustreren, oftewel ontwerpen in de breedste zin van het woord. Hoe ik dat precies vorm ga geven moet ik nog gaan ontdekken, vandaar vind je op mijn website geen traditioneel portfolio, maar een interactieve verzameling van alles op creatief gebied wat me interesseert en bezig houdt.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/design-touch.jpeg
Design Touch
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/appelblauwzeegroen-grafisch-ontwerp.jpeg
Appelblauwzeegroen Grafisch Ontwerp
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Design Touch
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Appelblauwzeegroen Grafisch Ontwerp
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Design Touch in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Appelblauwzeegroen Grafisch Ontwerp in 2025.

Incident History — Design Touch (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Design Touch cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Appelblauwzeegroen Grafisch Ontwerp (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Appelblauwzeegroen Grafisch Ontwerp cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/design-touch.jpeg
Design Touch
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/appelblauwzeegroen-grafisch-ontwerp.jpeg
Appelblauwzeegroen Grafisch Ontwerp
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Design Touch company and Appelblauwzeegroen Grafisch Ontwerp company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Appelblauwzeegroen Grafisch Ontwerp company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Design Touch company.

In the current year, Appelblauwzeegroen Grafisch Ontwerp company and Design Touch company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Appelblauwzeegroen Grafisch Ontwerp company nor Design Touch company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Appelblauwzeegroen Grafisch Ontwerp company nor Design Touch company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Appelblauwzeegroen Grafisch Ontwerp company nor Design Touch company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Design Touch company nor Appelblauwzeegroen Grafisch Ontwerp company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Design Touch nor Appelblauwzeegroen Grafisch Ontwerp holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Design Touch company nor Appelblauwzeegroen Grafisch Ontwerp company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Design Touch company and Appelblauwzeegroen Grafisch Ontwerp company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Design Touch nor Appelblauwzeegroen Grafisch Ontwerp holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Design Touch nor Appelblauwzeegroen Grafisch Ontwerp holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Design Touch nor Appelblauwzeegroen Grafisch Ontwerp holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Design Touch nor Appelblauwzeegroen Grafisch Ontwerp holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Design Touch nor Appelblauwzeegroen Grafisch Ontwerp holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Design Touch nor Appelblauwzeegroen Grafisch Ontwerp holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X