Comparison Overview

Design To Print

VS

Hassig Print & Design

Design To Print

175 N 400 E, St. George, Utah, 84770, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Operating since 1995, Design To Print, Inc. has grown to become one of the largest grand format print shops in the United States. We started as a Pre-Press Service Bureau that provided digital color separations for the offset print industry. As Design To Print continued to expand, an opportunity to print for the 2002 Olympic Games in Salt Lake City presented itself. The job required the use of 16’ wide grand format graphics, which marked a turning point for the business. Today, Design To Print specializes in event and trade show activations, custom brand experiences, and metal fabrication. Our display building components and lighting are uniquely designed in-house and have several patented and patent pending filings. With a team of highly skilled professionals in color, creative, design, and fabrication, Design To Print has the ability to transform your ideas into reality. We are committed to elevate your brand with unmatched quality and care!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 82
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Hassig Print & Design

40817 Garfield Rd, Clinton Township, Michigan, 48038, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Hassig Print & Design is family owned & operated and is the business for businesses. We help small businesses build, brand and grow. We service a variety of industries and have a reputation for exceptional price points and quality of products and service that is next to none. Hassig Print & Design is a modern company that focuses on efficiency and quality. We go to work for our customers and find them exactly what they need and exceed their expectations. We're proud to be a Shopify Partner offering our clients cutting web designs with the industries top performing business solution. Here are our core services that we can offer you: - Graphic Design Services - Full Color Digital Printing - Shopify e-Commerce Website Design - MailChimp Email Marketing

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/design-to-print.jpeg
Design To Print
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hassig-print-&-design.jpeg
Hassig Print & Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Design To Print
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hassig Print & Design
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Design To Print in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hassig Print & Design in 2025.

Incident History — Design To Print (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Design To Print cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hassig Print & Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hassig Print & Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/design-to-print.jpeg
Design To Print
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hassig-print-&-design.jpeg
Hassig Print & Design
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hassig Print & Design company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Design To Print company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Hassig Print & Design company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Design To Print company.

In the current year, Hassig Print & Design company and Design To Print company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hassig Print & Design company nor Design To Print company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Hassig Print & Design company nor Design To Print company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hassig Print & Design company nor Design To Print company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Design To Print company nor Hassig Print & Design company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Design To Print nor Hassig Print & Design holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Design To Print company nor Hassig Print & Design company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Design To Print company employs more people globally than Hassig Print & Design company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Design To Print nor Hassig Print & Design holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Design To Print nor Hassig Print & Design holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Design To Print nor Hassig Print & Design holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Design To Print nor Hassig Print & Design holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Design To Print nor Hassig Print & Design holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Design To Print nor Hassig Print & Design holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L