Comparison Overview

the Design Museum

VS

Alimentarium

the Design Museum

224 - 238 Kensington High Street, London, undefined, W8 6AG, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

the Design Museum is one of the world’s leading museums devoted to contemporary design in every form from furniture to graphics, and architecture to industrial design. The museum is working to place design at the centre of contemporary culture and demonstrates both the creative richness found in all forms of design, and its importance.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 263
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Alimentarium

Quai Perdonnet 25, Vevey, 1800, CH
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Premier musée au monde consacré à l’alimentation, l’Alimentarium présente depuis plus de 30 ans d’un point de vue global et indépendant les multiples facettes de l’alimentation humaine. Adoptant une approche pluridisciplinaire tant culturelle, historique, que scientifique et nutritionnelle, le Musée s’est imposé au fil du temps comme référence incontournable de l’alimentation grâce à sa programmation audacieuse et décalée. The first museum in the world devoted to food, the Alimentarium has presented the many facets of human nutrition from a global and independent point of view for more than 30 years. Adopting a cultural, historical, scientific, and nutritional multidisciplinary approach, the Museum has established itself over time as an essential reference in food thanks to its audacious and offbeat programming.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/design-museum.jpeg
the Design Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alimentarium.jpeg
Alimentarium
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
the Design Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Alimentarium
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for the Design Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alimentarium in 2026.

Incident History — the Design Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

the Design Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Alimentarium (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alimentarium cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/design-museum.jpeg
the Design Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alimentarium.jpeg
Alimentarium
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

the Design Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Alimentarium company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Alimentarium company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to the Design Museum company.

In the current year, Alimentarium company and the Design Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Alimentarium company nor the Design Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Alimentarium company nor the Design Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Alimentarium company nor the Design Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither the Design Museum company nor Alimentarium company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither the Design Museum nor Alimentarium holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither the Design Museum company nor Alimentarium company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

the Design Museum company employs more people globally than Alimentarium company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither the Design Museum nor Alimentarium holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither the Design Museum nor Alimentarium holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither the Design Museum nor Alimentarium holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither the Design Museum nor Alimentarium holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither the Design Museum nor Alimentarium holds HIPAA certification.

Neither the Design Museum nor Alimentarium holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H