Comparison Overview

Design Image

VS

DesignLab

Design Image

None
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 800 and 849

Design Image was formed in 1985 by 3 partners, John McEvoy and Dara O’Doherty and Cliona MacDonnell, in 1985, all Bachelor of Design Graduates from the National College of Art & Design. Design Image has successfully grown over the last 27 years and has established a clear understanding of client and consumer needs. The principle reason for the company’s success has been its ability to provide clients with the highest standards of design services in the time and manner in which they require them. The company’s workload is widely varied and includes private and public sector clients. Over the years Design image, along with successful corporate clients, has gained an award winning reputation in the areas of marketing property and publishing in Ireland.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

DesignLab

134a The Parade, Norwood, South Australia, 5067, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Brand design are as individual as fingerprints. They need to be. Tailored to each client to create a unique ‘personality’. Our work – showcased here – is the result of partnership. Each example the result of the client collaboration that ensures our best work. Distinctive, effective solutions that speak for themselves. Read what each client says about this ‘chemistry’. We call it ‘creativity that connects’ – you with your clients. If you trust your design assignment to DesignLab we’ll work with you as much as for you. Hopefully the result will knock your – and your customers’ – socks off! We work with every one of our clients to develop and grow new and inspiring brands and refresh existing ones. Creating unique and individual visual identity. We hope that fresh approach to each client’s needs is demonstrated here in this showcase of our graphic design work. Our aim is always to better connect you with your customers at every moment of visual interaction. Judge us by the company we keep. We actually don’t much like talking about ourselves. We’d rather let our work do the talking and believe it’s much more important to hear what our clients say about their experiences with DesignLab. In essence, our clients find the experience enjoyable – they actually like working with us. We believe it’s our ability to ‘get along’ with people that keeps them coming back and recommending us to others. We really do value every client partnership. That chemistry helps us produce the design creativity that connects – you with your clients. Find out for yourself. Meet us to discover how we could work together – collaborate – in finding the design solution that’s right for you.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/design-image.jpeg
Design Image
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/designlab.net.au.jpeg
DesignLab
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Design Image
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DesignLab
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Design Image in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DesignLab in 2025.

Incident History — Design Image (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Design Image cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DesignLab (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DesignLab cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/design-image.jpeg
Design Image
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/designlab.net.au.jpeg
DesignLab
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Design Image company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to DesignLab company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, DesignLab company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Design Image company.

In the current year, DesignLab company and Design Image company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither DesignLab company nor Design Image company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither DesignLab company nor Design Image company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither DesignLab company nor Design Image company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Design Image company nor DesignLab company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Design Image nor DesignLab holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Design Image company nor DesignLab company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Design Image company employs more people globally than DesignLab company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Design Image nor DesignLab holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Design Image nor DesignLab holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Design Image nor DesignLab holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Design Image nor DesignLab holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Design Image nor DesignLab holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Design Image nor DesignLab holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X