Comparison Overview

Design Identity Australia

VS

Salt and Light Photography

Design Identity Australia

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://designidentity.com.au/

Design Identity is Australia’s leading creative advertising and photography agency renown within the fashion and lifestyle industries. We consistently provide the highest level of visual work for all our valued partners such as GUESS, Ben Sherman, Lacoste, Reebok, Hurley, Sass + Bide and many more. Our extensive, professional knowledge of the latest and greatest trends enables us to drive record sales for our clients by providing outstanding solutions and creative packages of the utmost quality. With a combined staff experience of over 30 years, our specialist team guarantees an increase in brand awareness, vast improvements in image quality and in heightened overall online presence for your brand through the services of advertising, photography, re-touching, graphic design, branding, and web design & development.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Salt and Light Photography

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 800 and 849
http://www.saltandlightphoto.com

Salt and Light Photography is proud to be serving the Kansas City Metro area in professional photography and videography. We shoot for many occasions ranging from baby portraits and families to weddings, boudoir and events. Our company is based off of the scripture in Matthew 5:13-16 and we desire to be light and a joy to all those we encounter. We absolutely put our clients first, and work with you to exceed your best expectations. Our joy is getting to know you and giving you a quality product that will last you a lifetime.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/design-identity.jpeg
Design Identity Australia
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Salt and Light Photography
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Design Identity Australia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Salt and Light Photography
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Design Identity Australia in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Salt and Light Photography in 2025.

Incident History — Design Identity Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Design Identity Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Salt and Light Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Salt and Light Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/design-identity.jpeg
Design Identity Australia
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Salt and Light Photography
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Salt and Light Photography company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Design Identity Australia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Salt and Light Photography company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Design Identity Australia company.

In the current year, Salt and Light Photography company and Design Identity Australia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Salt and Light Photography company nor Design Identity Australia company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Salt and Light Photography company nor Design Identity Australia company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Salt and Light Photography company nor Design Identity Australia company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Design Identity Australia company nor Salt and Light Photography company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Design Identity Australia nor Salt and Light Photography holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Design Identity Australia company nor Salt and Light Photography company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Design Identity Australia company employs more people globally than Salt and Light Photography company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Design Identity Australia nor Salt and Light Photography holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Design Identity Australia nor Salt and Light Photography holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Design Identity Australia nor Salt and Light Photography holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Design Identity Australia nor Salt and Light Photography holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Design Identity Australia nor Salt and Light Photography holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Design Identity Australia nor Salt and Light Photography holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References