Comparison Overview

Design Identity Australia

VS

InfrastructurePhotos

Design Identity Australia

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://designidentity.com.au/

Design Identity is Australia’s leading creative advertising and photography agency renown within the fashion and lifestyle industries. We consistently provide the highest level of visual work for all our valued partners such as GUESS, Ben Sherman, Lacoste, Reebok, Hurley, Sass + Bide and many more. Our extensive, professional knowledge of the latest and greatest trends enables us to drive record sales for our clients by providing outstanding solutions and creative packages of the utmost quality. With a combined staff experience of over 30 years, our specialist team guarantees an increase in brand awareness, vast improvements in image quality and in heightened overall online presence for your brand through the services of advertising, photography, re-touching, graphic design, branding, and web design & development.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

InfrastructurePhotos

Johannesburg, ZA
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799
http://www.infrastructurephotos.com

InfrastructurePhotos provides high quality infrastructure photography services for the Built Environment (architecture, commercial, industrial, infrastructure, healthcare, education, hospitality and energy) to serve as a permanent image record of all of your projects. 15 years of local and international exposure to the architectural and engineering sectors, along with a comprehensive technical understanding of design plays a significant role in our approach to capturing the design intent and emotional contribution of infrastructure. Our approach captures all stages of construction progress in line with relevant work stages, from inception to project completion. Would-be valuable photographic evidence and valuable information are often ruined due to out-of-focus, poorly lit or poor quality images. Our use of state of the art equipment and technology contributes to our sublime quality and relevant photography.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/design-identity.jpeg
Design Identity Australia
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/infrastructurephotos.jpeg
InfrastructurePhotos
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Design Identity Australia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
InfrastructurePhotos
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Design Identity Australia in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for InfrastructurePhotos in 2025.

Incident History — Design Identity Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Design Identity Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — InfrastructurePhotos (X = Date, Y = Severity)

InfrastructurePhotos cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/design-identity.jpeg
Design Identity Australia
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/infrastructurephotos.jpeg
InfrastructurePhotos
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

InfrastructurePhotos company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Design Identity Australia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, InfrastructurePhotos company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Design Identity Australia company.

In the current year, InfrastructurePhotos company and Design Identity Australia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither InfrastructurePhotos company nor Design Identity Australia company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither InfrastructurePhotos company nor Design Identity Australia company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither InfrastructurePhotos company nor Design Identity Australia company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Design Identity Australia company nor InfrastructurePhotos company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Design Identity Australia nor InfrastructurePhotos holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Design Identity Australia company nor InfrastructurePhotos company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Design Identity Australia company employs more people globally than InfrastructurePhotos company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Design Identity Australia nor InfrastructurePhotos holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Design Identity Australia nor InfrastructurePhotos holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Design Identity Australia nor InfrastructurePhotos holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Design Identity Australia nor InfrastructurePhotos holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Design Identity Australia nor InfrastructurePhotos holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Design Identity Australia nor InfrastructurePhotos holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References