Comparison Overview

Design 4, Inc.

VS

Graphic Management Partners

Design 4, Inc.

3232 H Street, Omaha, Nebraska, 68107, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Design 4 has been a leader in the custom sign printing business for over 25 years! Located in Omaha, NE, our production facility boasts 23,000 SF. We strive to serve the industry with quality sign products, excellent printing skills, and great customer service. Our short production time means we can provide customers with excellent service along with great quality, delivered every time. Our top of the line technology and equipment also means that the finished products meet the highest quality with the latest industry standards. From simple vinyl letter to complex graphics, our experienced graphic design staff can help you from initial concept to final application. Our proofing system ensures that the artwork is approved before production, making sure the customer's expectations are met and exceeded.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Graphic Management Partners

47 Purdy Ave, Port Chester, New York, 10573, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Since 1986 Graphic Management Partners (GMP) has prided itself on being a leading commercial offset and digital printer in the tri-state area. GMP’s goal continues to be one that provides quality print options with competitive price rates all supported by personal customer service. Our team understands how important your company message is – we take it as our own! Facilitating that message through digital and offset print channels is what we do best. We provide a wide range of offerings like web-based ordering, prepress editing, digital print, offset print, large format, mailing, specialty kitting and fulfillment – all completed with quality measures, timeliness and budget management. Please contact us to see why we believe in “The Power of Print”. General Contact: [email protected] Website: http://www.gmprt.com Industry: Commercial Printing Company Size: 85 Headquarters: Port Chester, New York Type: LLC Founded: 1986 Specialties: Brochures, Books, Catalogs, Custom Binding, Direct Mail, Large Format, POS, Posters, Prepress, Print Management,

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/design-4-inc-.jpeg
Design 4, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graphic-management-partners-llc..jpeg
Graphic Management Partners
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Design 4, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Graphic Management Partners
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Design 4, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Graphic Management Partners in 2025.

Incident History — Design 4, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Design 4, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Graphic Management Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Graphic Management Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/design-4-inc-.jpeg
Design 4, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graphic-management-partners-llc..jpeg
Graphic Management Partners
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Design 4, Inc. company and Graphic Management Partners company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Graphic Management Partners company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Design 4, Inc. company.

In the current year, Graphic Management Partners company and Design 4, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Graphic Management Partners company nor Design 4, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Graphic Management Partners company nor Design 4, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Graphic Management Partners company nor Design 4, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Design 4, Inc. company nor Graphic Management Partners company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Design 4, Inc. nor Graphic Management Partners holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Design 4, Inc. company nor Graphic Management Partners company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Graphic Management Partners company employs more people globally than Design 4, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Design 4, Inc. nor Graphic Management Partners holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Design 4, Inc. nor Graphic Management Partners holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Design 4, Inc. nor Graphic Management Partners holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Design 4, Inc. nor Graphic Management Partners holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Design 4, Inc. nor Graphic Management Partners holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Design 4, Inc. nor Graphic Management Partners holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N