Comparison Overview

Desert Botanical Garden

VS

Converge 45

Desert Botanical Garden

1201 N Galvin Parkway, Phoenix, Az, 85008, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dbg.org

The Desert Botanical Garden's commitment to the community is to advance excellence in education, research, exhibition, and conservation of desert plants of the world with an emphasis on the Southwestern United States. We will ensure that the Garden is always a compelling attraction that brings to like the many wonders of the desert.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 198
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Converge 45

undefined, Portland, OR, 97202, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799
http://converge45.org

Mission: To enrich the region’s art community and connect it to the contemporary art world. A dynamic community of Portland arts organizations, galleries, artists, art professionals, and community business partners has joined together to realize the vision of Converge 45, a nonprofit organization that provides a curatorial platform for the visual arts in Portland and the surrounding region. Through annual programming led by a Guest Artistic Director in collaboration with cultural partners, Converge 45 engages with national and international conversations on contemporary art.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/desert-botanical-garden.jpeg
Desert Botanical Garden
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/converge45.jpeg
Converge 45
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Desert Botanical Garden
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Converge 45
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Desert Botanical Garden in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Converge 45 in 2025.

Incident History — Desert Botanical Garden (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Desert Botanical Garden cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Converge 45 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Converge 45 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/desert-botanical-garden.jpeg
Desert Botanical Garden
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/converge45.jpeg
Converge 45
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Desert Botanical Garden company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Converge 45 company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Converge 45 company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Desert Botanical Garden company.

In the current year, Converge 45 company and Desert Botanical Garden company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Converge 45 company nor Desert Botanical Garden company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Converge 45 company nor Desert Botanical Garden company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Converge 45 company nor Desert Botanical Garden company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Desert Botanical Garden company nor Converge 45 company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Desert Botanical Garden nor Converge 45 holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Desert Botanical Garden company nor Converge 45 company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Desert Botanical Garden company employs more people globally than Converge 45 company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Desert Botanical Garden nor Converge 45 holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Desert Botanical Garden nor Converge 45 holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Desert Botanical Garden nor Converge 45 holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Desert Botanical Garden nor Converge 45 holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Desert Botanical Garden nor Converge 45 holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Desert Botanical Garden nor Converge 45 holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References