Comparison Overview

United States Department of War

VS

Army National Guard

United States Department of War

Washington, DC, US
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 800 and 849

The mission of the Department of War is to provide military forces necessary to protect the security of our country. The U.S. military defends the homeland, deters adversaries, and builds security around the world by projecting U.S. influence and working with allies and partners. In case deterrence fails, the U.S. military is prepared to fight and win decisively against any adversary. Headed by Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, the Department is not only in charge of the military, it also employs a topnotch civilian workforce. With more than 1.3 million men and women on active duty, and 742,000 civilian personnel, we are also the nation's largest employer. The Pentagon, headquarters of the Department of War, is one of the largest office buildings in the world. Built in 1941 by the U.S. Army, the Pentagon has 17.5 miles of corridors yet it takes only seven minutes to walk between any two points in the building. Department of War personnel are the backbone of America’s national security. They represent the diverse makeup of our nation and support not only those on active duty but also families, veterans, and retirees through education, training, and benefit programs. Anything you want to do – on land, sea, air, or space -- you can do in service to your nation by joining the Department of War. Search for Jobs and Internships at USAJobs.gov. http://dodcio.defense.gov/SocialMedia/UserAgreement.aspx

NAICS: 92811
NAICS Definition: National Security
Employees: 65,996
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
3

Army National Guard

111 S George Mason Dr, Arlington, Virginia, 22204, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 650 and 699

Welcome to the Army National Guard's page on LinkedIn.  The Army National Guard, also known as the National Guard, is one component of The Army (which consists of the Active Army, the Army National Guard, and the Army Reserve). National Guard Soldiers serve both community and country. Our versatility enables us to respond to domestic emergencies, overseas combat missions, counterdrug efforts, reconstruction missions and more. If you are interested in learning more about the career opportunities and educational benefits made possible through service in the National Guard, visit www.NATIONALGUARD.com or talk with our team today at https://bit.ly/2uXk12R. For those seeking official information and news tied to the Army National Guard, visit www.ng.mil.

NAICS: 92811
NAICS Definition: National Security
Employees: 56,864
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/deptofwar.jpeg
United States Department of War
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/army-national-guard.jpeg
Army National Guard
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
United States Department of War
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Army National Guard
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for United States Department of War in 2025.

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Army National Guard in 2025.

Incident History — United States Department of War (X = Date, Y = Severity)

United States Department of War cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Army National Guard (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Army National Guard cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/deptofwar.jpeg
United States Department of War
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Botnet, Malware Infection (DVRs, WiFi Routers), DDoS-for-Hire Service
Motivation: Financial Gain, Extortion, Cybercrime-as-a-Service
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Motivation: Enhancing cyber defense capabilities
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Enhancing protective measures for US troops against low-cost adversarial drones
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/army-national-guard.jpeg
Army National Guard
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Network Compromise
Motivation: Intelligence Gathering, Critical Infrastructure Sabotage
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploiting vulnerabilities in Cisco's routers and similar hardware
Motivation: Disrupt networks, Steal key intelligence, Prepare for potential conflict over Taiwan
Blog: Blog

FAQ

United States Department of War company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Army National Guard company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

United States Department of War company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Army National Guard company.

In the current year, United States Department of War company has reported more cyber incidents than Army National Guard company.

Neither Army National Guard company nor United States Department of War company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Army National Guard company has disclosed at least one data breach, while United States Department of War company has not reported such incidents publicly.

United States Department of War company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Army National Guard company has not reported such incidents publicly.

United States Department of War company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Army National Guard company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither United States Department of War nor Army National Guard holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

United States Department of War company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Army National Guard company.

United States Department of War company employs more people globally than Army National Guard company, reflecting its scale as a Armed Forces.

Neither United States Department of War nor Army National Guard holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither United States Department of War nor Army National Guard holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither United States Department of War nor Army National Guard holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither United States Department of War nor Army National Guard holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither United States Department of War nor Army National Guard holds HIPAA certification.

Neither United States Department of War nor Army National Guard holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H