Comparison Overview

Dept. of Mental Health & Substance Abuse

VS

Regional Development Australia Tasmania

Dept. of Mental Health & Substance Abuse

GU
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 800 and 849

Welcome Our Vision An island community empowered and committed to making healthy choices -- "Totally healthy, totally tobacco/alcohol and drug-free!" Our Mission Raise awareness about the effects of alcohol, tobacco and other substance abuse on Guam; Prevent/reduce alcohol, tobacco and other drug use, including underage drinking; Promote alcohol-free, tobacco-free and other drug-free lifestyles; Reduce the harmful outcomes associated with alcohol, tobacco and other drug use; Build Guam's capacity and infrastructure for establishing and sustaining evidence based substance abuse prevention early intervention programs that are effective.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 258
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Regional Development Australia Tasmania

20 Charles St, Launceston, Tasmania, 7250, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Regional Development Australia (RDA) is an Australian Government initiative established to encourage partnership between all levels of government to enhance the growth and development of Australia's regional communities. RDA committees operate under a national RDA Charter and report to the Australian Government on key outcomes. A national network of 55 RDA committees has been established and RDA Tasmania represents the entire state of Tasmania. RDA Tasmania is a not-for-profit organisation that has a formal partnership between the Australian Government, Tasmanian Government, and the Local Government Association of Tasmania (LGAT). A key focus of RDA Tasmania is on the economic, social and environmental issues affecting communities. Committee members of RDA Tasmania are committed volunteers who have been chosen by the Australian Government due to their understanding of, and experience in, a range of areas including their professional and industry background, community networks, skills and experience.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Dept. of Mental Health & Substance Abuse
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/regional-development-australia-tasmania.jpeg
Regional Development Australia Tasmania
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dept. of Mental Health & Substance Abuse
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Regional Development Australia Tasmania
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dept. of Mental Health & Substance Abuse in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Regional Development Australia Tasmania in 2025.

Incident History — Dept. of Mental Health & Substance Abuse (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dept. of Mental Health & Substance Abuse cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Regional Development Australia Tasmania (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Regional Development Australia Tasmania cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Dept. of Mental Health & Substance Abuse
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/regional-development-australia-tasmania.jpeg
Regional Development Australia Tasmania
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Dept. of Mental Health & Substance Abuse company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Regional Development Australia Tasmania company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Regional Development Australia Tasmania company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dept. of Mental Health & Substance Abuse company.

In the current year, Regional Development Australia Tasmania company and Dept. of Mental Health & Substance Abuse company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Regional Development Australia Tasmania company nor Dept. of Mental Health & Substance Abuse company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Regional Development Australia Tasmania company nor Dept. of Mental Health & Substance Abuse company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Regional Development Australia Tasmania company nor Dept. of Mental Health & Substance Abuse company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dept. of Mental Health & Substance Abuse company nor Regional Development Australia Tasmania company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dept. of Mental Health & Substance Abuse nor Regional Development Australia Tasmania holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Dept. of Mental Health & Substance Abuse company nor Regional Development Australia Tasmania company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Dept. of Mental Health & Substance Abuse company employs more people globally than Regional Development Australia Tasmania company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Dept. of Mental Health & Substance Abuse nor Regional Development Australia Tasmania holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dept. of Mental Health & Substance Abuse nor Regional Development Australia Tasmania holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dept. of Mental Health & Substance Abuse nor Regional Development Australia Tasmania holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dept. of Mental Health & Substance Abuse nor Regional Development Australia Tasmania holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dept. of Mental Health & Substance Abuse nor Regional Development Australia Tasmania holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dept. of Mental Health & Substance Abuse nor Regional Development Australia Tasmania holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N