Comparison Overview

Department of Homeland Security Office of the Chief Financial Officer

VS

County of Santa Clara

Department of Homeland Security Office of the Chief Financial Officer

None, None, Washington, District of Columbia, US, 20024
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.dhs.gov/office-chief-financial-officer

This site is designed to identify Department of Homeland Security employment opportunities in a variety of fields of financial management. Below are links to current announcements on USAJOBS. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) financial management community consists of 14 offices of the Chief Finical Officer. The Office of the Chief Financial Officer (OCFO) is responsible for the fiscal management, integrity and accountability of the department and financial operations. The mission of the OCFO is to provide guidance and oversight of the Department’s budget, financial management, financial operations for all Departmental management and operations, the DHS Working Capital Fund, grants and assistance awards, and resource management systems. This ensures that funds necessary to carry out the Department’s mission are obtained, allocated, and expended in accordance with the Department’s priorities and relevant laws and policies. DHS Components with OCFOs: The U.S. Customs and Boarder Protection The Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Office The Federal Emergency Management Agency The Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers The Office of the Chief Financial Officer The Office of Intelligence and Analysis Immigration and Customs Enforcement The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency The Office of Operations Coordination The Science and technology Directorate The Transportation Security Administration The United States Coast Guard The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services The United States Secret Service Links to positions on USA Jobs:

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 183
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

County of Santa Clara

70 W. Hedding St., San Jose, CA, US, 95110
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sccgov.org

The County of Santa Clara is located at the southern end of the San Francisco Bay and encompasses 1,312 square miles. It has one of the highest median family incomes in the country, and a wide diversity of cultures, backgrounds and talents. The County of Santa Clara continues to attract people from all over the world. With more than 70 agencies/departments and 22,000 employees, the County of Santa Clara plans for the needs of a dynamic community, provides quality services, and promotes a healthy, safe and prosperous community for all. The County provides essential services including public health protection, environmental protection, medical services through Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (SCVMC), child and adult protection services, homelessness prevention and solutions, roads, park services, libraries, emergency response to disasters, protection of minority communities and those under threat, access to a fair criminal justice system, and scores of other services, particularly for those members of our community in the greatest need. The County's population of nearly 1.9 million is one of the largest in the state, and the largest of the nine Bay Area counties. Its population constitutes about one fourth of the Bay Area's total population. There are 15 cities including Campbell, Cupertino, Gilroy, Los Altos, Los Altos Hills, Los Gatos, Milpitas, Monte Sereno, Morgan Hill, Mountain View, Palo Alto, San Jose, Santa Clara, Saratoga, and Sunnyvale ranging from Palo Alto to the north, to Gilroy in the south. San Jose is the largest city in the County, with a population of 1.035 million, and is the administrative site of County Government. A significant portion of the county's land area is unincorporated ranch and farmland. Nearly 92% of the population lives in cities. The County of Santa Clara operates 27 parks covering more than 50,000 acres including scenic lakes, streams, and miles of hiking and biking trails. santaclaracounty.gov/social-media-disclaimer

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 13,186
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/department-of-homeland-security-office-of-the-chief-financial-officer.jpeg
Department of Homeland Security Office of the Chief Financial Officer
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/county-of-santa-clara.jpeg
County of Santa Clara
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Department of Homeland Security Office of the Chief Financial Officer
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
County of Santa Clara
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Department of Homeland Security Office of the Chief Financial Officer in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for County of Santa Clara in 2025.

Incident History — Department of Homeland Security Office of the Chief Financial Officer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Department of Homeland Security Office of the Chief Financial Officer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — County of Santa Clara (X = Date, Y = Severity)

County of Santa Clara cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/department-of-homeland-security-office-of-the-chief-financial-officer.jpeg
Department of Homeland Security Office of the Chief Financial Officer
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Misconfigured Platform (Programming Error)
Motivation: Opportunistic Access, Espionage (Potential), Information Gathering
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/county-of-santa-clara.jpeg
County of Santa Clara
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2013
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Theft of Laptop
Blog: Blog

FAQ

County of Santa Clara company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Department of Homeland Security Office of the Chief Financial Officer company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Department of Homeland Security Office of the Chief Financial Officer and County of Santa Clara have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, County of Santa Clara company and Department of Homeland Security Office of the Chief Financial Officer company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither County of Santa Clara company nor Department of Homeland Security Office of the Chief Financial Officer company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both County of Santa Clara company and Department of Homeland Security Office of the Chief Financial Officer company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither County of Santa Clara company nor Department of Homeland Security Office of the Chief Financial Officer company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Department of Homeland Security Office of the Chief Financial Officer company nor County of Santa Clara company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Department of Homeland Security Office of the Chief Financial Officer nor County of Santa Clara holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Department of Homeland Security Office of the Chief Financial Officer company nor County of Santa Clara company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

County of Santa Clara company employs more people globally than Department of Homeland Security Office of the Chief Financial Officer company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither Department of Homeland Security Office of the Chief Financial Officer nor County of Santa Clara holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Department of Homeland Security Office of the Chief Financial Officer nor County of Santa Clara holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Department of Homeland Security Office of the Chief Financial Officer nor County of Santa Clara holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Department of Homeland Security Office of the Chief Financial Officer nor County of Santa Clara holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Department of Homeland Security Office of the Chief Financial Officer nor County of Santa Clara holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Department of Homeland Security Office of the Chief Financial Officer nor County of Santa Clara holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References