Comparison Overview

Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance

VS

ECHO, Leahy Center for Lake Champlain

Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance

2300 Steele St., Denver, Colorado, 80205, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Introducing Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance. New Name. Eternal Mission. For 128 years, Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance has connected people with wildlife. From our early years with just a few Colorado species to the 2,500+ animals thriving in our care today, we have cultivated a welcoming gateway to the wonders of the natural world. Today, our mission, Inspiring Communities to Save Wildlife for Future Generations, has never been more critical. This new name and logo reflect a renewed purpose: to continue delivering exceptional experiences on our historic campus, while doubling down on our commitment to conservation in Colorado and worldwide. #SavingWildlifeTogether

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 465
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ECHO, Leahy Center for Lake Champlain

1 College Street, Burlington, VT 05401, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

ECHO is a science and nature museum located on the Lake Champlain waterfront. ECHO is committed to engaging diverse public audiences and providing experiential, relevant and lifelong educational experiences for all our guests. Founded in 2003, ECHO houses more than 70 species of live animal ambassadors in Vermont’s first LEED certified building. This innovative science center and aquarium displays life in the Champlain Basin and inspires visitors to positively impact the world around them. ECHO is the public face of the Patrick and Marcelle Leahy Center for Lake Champlain, a 2.7 acre environmental campus on the Burlington Waterfront.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/denver-zoo.jpeg
Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/echo-leahy-center-for-lake-champlain.jpeg
ECHO, Leahy Center for Lake Champlain
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ECHO, Leahy Center for Lake Champlain
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ECHO, Leahy Center for Lake Champlain in 2025.

Incident History — Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ECHO, Leahy Center for Lake Champlain (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ECHO, Leahy Center for Lake Champlain cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/denver-zoo.jpeg
Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/echo-leahy-center-for-lake-champlain.jpeg
ECHO, Leahy Center for Lake Champlain
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ECHO, Leahy Center for Lake Champlain company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ECHO, Leahy Center for Lake Champlain company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance company.

In the current year, ECHO, Leahy Center for Lake Champlain company and Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ECHO, Leahy Center for Lake Champlain company nor Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ECHO, Leahy Center for Lake Champlain company nor Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ECHO, Leahy Center for Lake Champlain company nor Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance company nor ECHO, Leahy Center for Lake Champlain company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance nor ECHO, Leahy Center for Lake Champlain holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance company nor ECHO, Leahy Center for Lake Champlain company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance company employs more people globally than ECHO, Leahy Center for Lake Champlain company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance nor ECHO, Leahy Center for Lake Champlain holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance nor ECHO, Leahy Center for Lake Champlain holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance nor ECHO, Leahy Center for Lake Champlain holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance nor ECHO, Leahy Center for Lake Champlain holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance nor ECHO, Leahy Center for Lake Champlain holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance nor ECHO, Leahy Center for Lake Champlain holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X