Comparison Overview

Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance

VS

Boston Tea Party Ships & Museum

Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance

2300 Steele St., Denver, Colorado, 80205, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.denverzoo.org

Introducing Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance. New Name. Eternal Mission. For 128 years, Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance has connected people with wildlife. From our early years with just a few Colorado species to the 2,500+ animals thriving in our care today, we have cultivated a welcoming gateway to the wonders of the natural world. Today, our mission, Inspiring Communities to Save Wildlife for Future Generations, has never been more critical. This new name and logo reflect a renewed purpose: to continue delivering exceptional experiences on our historic campus, while doubling down on our commitment to conservation in Colorado and worldwide. #SavingWildlifeTogether

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 465
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Boston Tea Party Ships & Museum

306 Congress Street, Boston, MA, 02210, US
Last Update: 2026-01-16
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bostonteapartyships.com

The Boston Tea Party, “the single most important event leading up to the American Revolution,” occurred the night of December 16th 1773. The Boston Tea Party Ships & Museum, owned and operated by Historic Tours of America, is dedicated to accurately reliving that famous event. With a new state-of-the art museum and authentic replica ships; the Beaver and the Eleanor; the attraction will allow visitors to travel back in time to learn and experience the courageous acts of those who forever shaped the course of history.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/denver-zoo.jpeg
Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boston-tea-party-ships-&-museum.jpeg
Boston Tea Party Ships & Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Boston Tea Party Ships & Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boston Tea Party Ships & Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Boston Tea Party Ships & Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boston Tea Party Ships & Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/denver-zoo.jpeg
Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boston-tea-party-ships-&-museum.jpeg
Boston Tea Party Ships & Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Boston Tea Party Ships & Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Boston Tea Party Ships & Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance company.

In the current year, Boston Tea Party Ships & Museum company and Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Boston Tea Party Ships & Museum company nor Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Boston Tea Party Ships & Museum company nor Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Boston Tea Party Ships & Museum company nor Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance company nor Boston Tea Party Ships & Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance nor Boston Tea Party Ships & Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance company nor Boston Tea Party Ships & Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance company employs more people globally than Boston Tea Party Ships & Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance nor Boston Tea Party Ships & Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance nor Boston Tea Party Ships & Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance nor Boston Tea Party Ships & Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance nor Boston Tea Party Ships & Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance nor Boston Tea Party Ships & Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance nor Boston Tea Party Ships & Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References