Comparison Overview

Denver Art Museum

VS

Orange County Regional History Center

Denver Art Museum

100 W. 14th Avenue Parkway, Denver, CO, 80204, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23

The Denver Art Museum has been a leader in educational programming for more than two decades. The family-friendly approach is fully integrated into the galleries through a unique partnership between curators, designers, and educators for each discipline. A trailblazer in creating innovative opportunities that encourage visitors to interact with the collection, the museum is also known internationally for the way we help our visitors explore art and their own creativity. The DAM is one of the largest art museums between Chicago and the West Coast, with a collection of more than 70,000 works of art divided between nine permanent collections including African, American Indian, Asian, European and American, modern and contemporary, pre-Colombian, photography, Spanish Colonial, and western American art. Our holdings reflect our city and region—and provide invaluable ways for the community to learn about cultures from around the world.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 453
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Orange County Regional History Center

65 E. Central Blvd., Orlando, Florida, 32801, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

Mission: To serve as a gateway for community engagement, education, and inspiration by preserving and sharing Central Florida's continually unfolding story. The Orange County Regional History Center, a Smithsonian Institution affiliate and American Alliance of Museums member, is one of the state’s preeminent cultural institutions. The History Center includes a history museum in a renovated 1927 courthouse, the collection of the Historical Society of Central Florida, the Joseph L. Brechner Research Library, the Emporium Museum Store, and Heritage Square park. The museum has advanced its global mission to honor the past, explore the present, and shape the future through wide-ranging programs, permanent and traveling exhibits, and limited-run exhibitions from other prestigious institutions.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/denver-art-museum.jpeg
Denver Art Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/orange-county-regional-history-center.jpeg
Orange County Regional History Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Denver Art Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Orange County Regional History Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Denver Art Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Orange County Regional History Center in 2026.

Incident History — Denver Art Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Denver Art Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Orange County Regional History Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Orange County Regional History Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/denver-art-museum.jpeg
Denver Art Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/orange-county-regional-history-center.jpeg
Orange County Regional History Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Denver Art Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Orange County Regional History Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Orange County Regional History Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Denver Art Museum company.

In the current year, Orange County Regional History Center company and Denver Art Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Orange County Regional History Center company nor Denver Art Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Orange County Regional History Center company nor Denver Art Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Orange County Regional History Center company nor Denver Art Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Denver Art Museum company nor Orange County Regional History Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Denver Art Museum nor Orange County Regional History Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Denver Art Museum company nor Orange County Regional History Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Denver Art Museum company employs more people globally than Orange County Regional History Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Denver Art Museum nor Orange County Regional History Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Denver Art Museum nor Orange County Regional History Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Denver Art Museum nor Orange County Regional History Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Denver Art Museum nor Orange County Regional History Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Denver Art Museum nor Orange County Regional History Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Denver Art Museum nor Orange County Regional History Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H