Comparison Overview

dentsu

VS

Interpublic Group (IPG)

dentsu

1-8-1 Higashi-shimbashi, Tokyo, JP
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://bit.ly/3lDa6Ff

We are dentsu. We team together to help brands predict and plan for disruptive future opportunities and create new paths to growth in the sustainable economy. We know people better than anyone else and we use those insights to connect brand, content, commerce and experience, underpinned by modern creativity. We are the network designed for what’s next.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 17,547
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Interpublic Group (IPG)

909 Third Avenue, New York, NY, 10022, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://www.interpublic.com

Interpublic (NYSE: IPG) is a values-based, data-fueled, and creatively-driven provider of marketing solutions. Home to some of the world’s best-known and most innovative communications specialists, IPG global brands include Acxiom, Craft, FCB, FutureBrand, Golin, Initiative, IPG Health, IPG Mediabrands, Jack Morton, KINESSO, MAGNA, McCann, Mediahub, Momentum, MRM, MullenLowe Global, Octagon, UM, Weber Shandwick and more. IPG is an S&P 500 company with total revenue of $10.7 billion in 2024.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 15,245
Subsidiaries: 36
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dentsu.jpeg
dentsu
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ipg.jpeg
Interpublic Group (IPG)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
dentsu
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Interpublic Group (IPG)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

dentsu has 119.78% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Interpublic Group (IPG) in 2025.

Incident History — dentsu (X = Date, Y = Severity)

dentsu cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Interpublic Group (IPG) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Interpublic Group (IPG) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dentsu.jpeg
dentsu
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ipg.jpeg
Interpublic Group (IPG)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Interpublic Group (IPG) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to dentsu company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

dentsu company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Interpublic Group (IPG) company has not reported any.

In the current year, dentsu company has reported more cyber incidents than Interpublic Group (IPG) company.

Neither Interpublic Group (IPG) company nor dentsu company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

dentsu company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Interpublic Group (IPG) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Interpublic Group (IPG) company nor dentsu company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither dentsu company nor Interpublic Group (IPG) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither dentsu nor Interpublic Group (IPG) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Interpublic Group (IPG) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to dentsu company.

dentsu company employs more people globally than Interpublic Group (IPG) company, reflecting its scale as a Advertising Services.

Neither dentsu nor Interpublic Group (IPG) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither dentsu nor Interpublic Group (IPG) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither dentsu nor Interpublic Group (IPG) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither dentsu nor Interpublic Group (IPG) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither dentsu nor Interpublic Group (IPG) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither dentsu nor Interpublic Group (IPG) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References