Comparison Overview

Dentistry.One

VS

Labcorp

Dentistry.One

460 Main St, Metuchen, 08840, US
Last Update: 2025-12-27
Between 650 and 699

At Dentistry.One, we’re bringing a comprehensive virtual-first solution to today’s patients to transform oral healthcare and the dental patient care journey. With a trusted network of on-demand dentists, personalized care coordination and oral health coaching, patients can receive ongoing support throughout the patient care journey. We provide dental service organizations, employers, health plans and benefits brokers a unique health plan benefit for members and employees.​ Unlock the next dimension of oral healthcare with Dentistry.One.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Labcorp

531 South Spring Street, Burlington, North Carolina, US, 27215
Last Update: 2025-12-27
Between 750 and 799

Clear and confident health care decisions begin with questions. At Labcorp, we’re constantly in pursuit of answers. As a global leader of innovative and comprehensive laboratory services, we help doctors, hospitals, pharmaceutical companies, researchers and patients make clear and confident decisions. We provide insights and advance science to improve health and improve lives through our unparalleled diagnostics and drug development laboratory capabilities. Our more than 60,000 employees serve clients in over 100 countries, worked on over 80% of the new drugs approved by the FDA in 2022 and performed more than 600 million tests for patients around the world. Learn more about Labcorp (NYSE: LH) at www.labcorp.com.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 40,562
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dentistry-one.jpeg
Dentistry.One
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/labcorp.jpeg
Labcorp
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dentistry.One
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Labcorp
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

Dentistry.One has 17.65% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Labcorp in 2025.

Incident History — Dentistry.One (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dentistry.One cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Labcorp (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Labcorp cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dentistry-one.jpeg
Dentistry.One
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/labcorp.jpeg
Labcorp
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2018
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 07/2018
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Labcorp company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dentistry.One company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Labcorp company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Dentistry.One company.

In the current year, Dentistry.One company has reported more cyber incidents than Labcorp company.

Labcorp company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Dentistry.One company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Labcorp company and Dentistry.One company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Labcorp company nor Dentistry.One company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dentistry.One company nor Labcorp company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dentistry.One nor Labcorp holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Labcorp company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Dentistry.One company.

Labcorp company employs more people globally than Dentistry.One company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Dentistry.One nor Labcorp holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dentistry.One nor Labcorp holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dentistry.One nor Labcorp holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dentistry.One nor Labcorp holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dentistry.One nor Labcorp holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dentistry.One nor Labcorp holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to version 2.0.0, in self-hosted n8n instances where the Code node runs in legacy (non-task-runner) JavaScript execution mode, authenticated users with workflow editing access can invoke internal helper functions from within the Code node. This allows a workflow editor to perform actions on the n8n host with the same privileges as the n8n process, including: reading files from the host filesystem (subject to any file-access restrictions configured on the instance and OS/container permissions), and writing files to the host filesystem (subject to the same restrictions). This issue has been patched in version 2.0.0. Workarounds for this issue involve limiting file operations by setting N8N_RESTRICT_FILE_ACCESS_TO to a dedicated directory (e.g., ~/.n8n-files) and ensure it contains no sensitive data, keeping N8N_BLOCK_FILE_ACCESS_TO_N8N_FILES=true (default) to block access to .n8n and user-defined config files, and disabling high-risk nodes (including the Code node) using NODES_EXCLUDE if workflow editors are not fully trusted.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. From version 1.0.0 to before 2.0.0, a sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in the Python Code Node that uses Pyodide. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows can exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands on the host system running n8n, using the same privileges as the n8n process. This issue has been patched in version 2.0.0. Workarounds for this issue involve disabling the Code Node by setting the environment variable NODES_EXCLUDE: "[\"n8n-nodes-base.code\"]", disabling Python support in the Code node by setting the environment variable N8N_PYTHON_ENABLED=false, which was introduced in n8n version 1.104.0, and configuring n8n to use the task runner based Python sandbox via the N8N_RUNNERS_ENABLED and N8N_NATIVE_PYTHON_RUNNER environment variables.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

LMDeploy is a toolkit for compressing, deploying, and serving LLMs. Prior to version 0.11.1, an insecure deserialization vulnerability exists in lmdeploy where torch.load() is called without the weights_only=True parameter when loading model checkpoint files. This allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the victim's machine when they load a malicious .bin or .pt model file. This issue has been patched in version 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to version 1.114.0, a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability may occur in n8n when using the “Respond to Webhook” node. When this node responds with HTML content containing executable scripts, the payload may execute directly in the top-level window, rather than within the expected sandbox introduced in version 1.103.0. This behavior can enable a malicious actor with workflow creation permissions to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of the n8n editor interface. This issue has been patched in version 1.114.0. Workarounds for this issue involve restricting workflow creation and modification privileges to trusted users only, avoiding use of untrusted HTML responses in the “Respond to Webhook” node, and using an external reverse proxy or HTML sanitizer to filter responses that include executable scripts.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Yealink T21P_E2 Phone 52.84.0.15 is vulnerable to Directory Traversal. A remote normal privileged attacker can read arbitrary files via a crafted request result read function of the diagnostic component.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N