Comparison Overview

Dennehy Law

VS

Geodesys

Dennehy Law

127 Main St, Ste 1, Nashua, New Hampshire, 03060, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

We are a boutique law firm focused on Litigation and Legal Counseling businesses and individuals. Our firm is dedicated to providing high-quality client services in achieving proven results. The firm is proud of its commitment to cost-effective and personalized representation. Nashua | Boston We mainly practice in the following areas: Business Litigation, Corporate Law, Design & Construction Law, Litigation, Employment Practices, and Insurance Law. Attorneys in the firm have litigated hundreds of cases with exception results, including numerous bench and jury trials in state and federal courts, as well as arbitration and administrative proceedings. The firm embraces economical results for its clients and regularly engages in Alternative Dispute Resolution/Mediation, obtaining highly favorable results in settlement negotiations.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Geodesys

Percy Road, Huntingdon, PE29 6SZ, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Geodesys is a leading provider of residential and commercial conveyancing searches in England and Wales. We offer a full range of reports including compliance, environmental, Local Authority, drainage and water, flood, planning, chancel and energy and infrastructure. Geodesys is also an official provider of the CON29DW drainage and water report. Geodesys has been a provider of residential and commercial property searches since 1997 and, between our more senior team members, we offer well over 100 years of search expertise (and that’s not taking more recent colleagues into account!). We pride ourselves on our friendly and helpful customer service, including our tailored on-site support which is provided through our account managers. We also offer a Concierge service where we plot and order your searches for you, allowing you to provide a quicker and more efficient service to clients.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dennehy-law.jpeg
Dennehy Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/geodesys.jpeg
Geodesys
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dennehy Law
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Geodesys
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dennehy Law in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Geodesys in 2025.

Incident History — Dennehy Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dennehy Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Geodesys (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Geodesys cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dennehy-law.jpeg
Dennehy Law
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/geodesys.jpeg
Geodesys
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Dennehy Law company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Geodesys company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Geodesys company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dennehy Law company.

In the current year, Geodesys company and Dennehy Law company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Geodesys company nor Dennehy Law company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Geodesys company nor Dennehy Law company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Geodesys company nor Dennehy Law company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dennehy Law company nor Geodesys company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dennehy Law nor Geodesys holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Dennehy Law company nor Geodesys company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Geodesys company employs more people globally than Dennehy Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Dennehy Law nor Geodesys holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dennehy Law nor Geodesys holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dennehy Law nor Geodesys holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dennehy Law nor Geodesys holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dennehy Law nor Geodesys holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dennehy Law nor Geodesys holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X