Comparison Overview

Demos Helsinki

VS

Tuke Institute

Demos Helsinki

Mechelininkatu 3D, None, Helsinki, Helsinki, FI, 00100
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Demos Helsinki is a globally operating, independent think tank. Our mission is to lead societal transformations that can bring about a fair, sustainable and joyful next era. We conduct research, offer consultancy service and host a global alliance of social imagination. We intentionally strive to hold and balance exquisite tensions that pervade today’s societal structures and actors. Our work conceptually and practically reflects our perspective: that transformative change is needed. We believe this change includes a spectrum of partners, and the many unlikely coalitions it manifests, across societal sectors and geographies.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 81
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tuke Institute

Virtual, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-02

A translational, action-research organisation to define and promote health-effective medical services, civil capacity-building, and public participation in the design and governance of medical services. It focuses on bridging the gap between the reality of illness and the medical and scientific services that are provided to help people get well and stay well. The Institute is unique in relying significantly on the guidance of scientists, clinicians, and other providers who themselves have chronic illnesses.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/demos-helsinki.jpeg
Demos Helsinki
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tuke-institute.jpeg
Tuke Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Demos Helsinki
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tuke Institute
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Demos Helsinki in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tuke Institute in 2025.

Incident History — Demos Helsinki (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Demos Helsinki cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tuke Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tuke Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/demos-helsinki.jpeg
Demos Helsinki
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tuke-institute.jpeg
Tuke Institute
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Tuke Institute company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Demos Helsinki company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tuke Institute company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Demos Helsinki company.

In the current year, Tuke Institute company and Demos Helsinki company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tuke Institute company nor Demos Helsinki company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tuke Institute company nor Demos Helsinki company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tuke Institute company nor Demos Helsinki company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Demos Helsinki company nor Tuke Institute company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Demos Helsinki nor Tuke Institute holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Demos Helsinki company nor Tuke Institute company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Demos Helsinki company employs more people globally than Tuke Institute company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Demos Helsinki nor Tuke Institute holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Demos Helsinki nor Tuke Institute holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Demos Helsinki nor Tuke Institute holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Demos Helsinki nor Tuke Institute holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Demos Helsinki nor Tuke Institute holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Demos Helsinki nor Tuke Institute holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X