Comparison Overview

Demos Helsinki

VS

Copenhagen Consensus Center

Demos Helsinki

Mechelininkatu 3D, None, Helsinki, Helsinki, FI, 00100
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Demos Helsinki is a globally operating, independent think tank. Our mission is to lead societal transformations that can bring about a fair, sustainable and joyful next era. We conduct research, offer consultancy service and host a global alliance of social imagination. We intentionally strive to hold and balance exquisite tensions that pervade today’s societal structures and actors. Our work conceptually and practically reflects our perspective: that transformative change is needed. We believe this change includes a spectrum of partners, and the many unlikely coalitions it manifests, across societal sectors and geographies.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 81
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Copenhagen Consensus Center

None
Last Update: 2025-12-02

The Copenhagen Consensus Center is a think tank that researches and publishes the smartest solutions for the world's biggest problems by cost-benefit. Its studies are conducted by more than 100 economists from internationally renowned institutions, including seven Nobel Laureates, to advise policy-makers and philanthropists how to spend their money most effectively. The Center's advocacy for data-driven prioritization was voted into the top 20 campaigns worldwide in a think tank survey conducted by University of Pennsylvania “Copenhagen Consensus is an outstanding, visionary idea and deserves global coverage” - The Economist We work with some of the world's top economists (including 7 Nobel Laureates) to research and publish the smartest solutions to global challenges. Through social, economic and environmental benefit-cost research, we show policymakers and philanthropists how to do the most good for each dollar spent.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/demos-helsinki.jpeg
Demos Helsinki
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/copenhagen-consensus-center.jpeg
Copenhagen Consensus Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Demos Helsinki
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Copenhagen Consensus Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Demos Helsinki in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Copenhagen Consensus Center in 2025.

Incident History — Demos Helsinki (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Demos Helsinki cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Copenhagen Consensus Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Copenhagen Consensus Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/demos-helsinki.jpeg
Demos Helsinki
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/copenhagen-consensus-center.jpeg
Copenhagen Consensus Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Demos Helsinki company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Copenhagen Consensus Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Copenhagen Consensus Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Demos Helsinki company.

In the current year, Copenhagen Consensus Center company and Demos Helsinki company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Copenhagen Consensus Center company nor Demos Helsinki company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Copenhagen Consensus Center company nor Demos Helsinki company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Copenhagen Consensus Center company nor Demos Helsinki company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Demos Helsinki company nor Copenhagen Consensus Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Demos Helsinki nor Copenhagen Consensus Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Copenhagen Consensus Center company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Demos Helsinki company.

Demos Helsinki company employs more people globally than Copenhagen Consensus Center company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Demos Helsinki nor Copenhagen Consensus Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Demos Helsinki nor Copenhagen Consensus Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Demos Helsinki nor Copenhagen Consensus Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Demos Helsinki nor Copenhagen Consensus Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Demos Helsinki nor Copenhagen Consensus Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Demos Helsinki nor Copenhagen Consensus Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X