DEMI Healthcare Partners Breach Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (DEM03101603110725)

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the DEMI Healthcare Partners breach identified under incident ID DEM03101603110725.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of DEMI Healthcare Partners's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/demi-healthcare-partners, the number of followers: 1032, the industry type: Hospitals and Health Care and the number of employees: 19 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 759 and after the incident was 694 with a difference of -65 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on DEMI Healthcare Partners and their customers.

Pennsylvania Hospitalist Group, LLC recently reported "Pennsylvania Hospitalist Group data exposure via ApolloMD cybersecurity breach", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Pennsylvania Hospitalist Group, LLC, a medical practice specializing in emergency medicine, confirmed that patient data was exposed in a cybersecurity incident tied to its billing services provider, ApolloMD Business Services.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing True.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

Overall, the incident is a reminder of why proactive monitoring and strong governance matter.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Trusted Relationship (T1199) with moderate to high confidence (85%), supported by evidence indicating breach through its third-party billing services provider, **ApolloMD Business Services**. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including exposure of patient data, and patient Data under type_of_data_compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol (T1048) with moderate to high confidence (75%), with evidence including exposure of patient data (implied unauthorized transfer), and data exfiltration not explicitly denied in incident details. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating exposure (low confidence; no explicit mention of destruction, but data compromise implies potential misuse) and Resource Hijacking (T1496) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating reliance on a third-party vendor introduces additional complexity (possible abuse of vendor access). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.