Comparison Overview

Demeo LLP

VS

Cassan Maclean

Demeo LLP

66 Long Wharf, None, Boston, MA, US, 02110
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Demeo LLP is a litigation law firm in downtown Boston specializing in complex commercial litigation, white collar criminal defense, and government investigations. The firm represents local, regional, and multinational companies in all areas of business litigation, including contract disputes, white collar criminal matters, trade secret and injunction cases, government investigations, copyright and trademark actions, banking and bankruptcy litigation, labor and employment law, shareholder disputes, construction litigation, real estate litigation, zoning and land use matters. The firm offers its clients the personal service and lower cost of small firm, along with work product and advocacy to rival any large firm. Each of the firm's attorneys has practiced with major law firms and offers superior legal skills and advocacy. The firm's growing list of clients - which includes several Fortune 500 companies - stands as a testament to the experience, dedication and superior service of its attorneys.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cassan Maclean

190 O'Connor St, Ottawa, K2P2R3, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Our team of experienced lawyers, agents and paralegals offer a full range of procurement and protection services in all areas of intellectual property (IP) law. We do so through two different and complimentary IP firms, one being Cassan Maclean IP Agency Inc., which provides patent and trademark filing and prosecution services, and the other being Cassan Maclean, which provides legal services in the area of IP such as pre-litigation and litigation services.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/demeollp.jpeg
Demeo LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cassan-maclean.jpeg
Cassan Maclean
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Demeo LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cassan Maclean
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Demeo LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cassan Maclean in 2025.

Incident History — Demeo LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Demeo LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cassan Maclean (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cassan Maclean cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/demeollp.jpeg
Demeo LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cassan-maclean.jpeg
Cassan Maclean
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cassan Maclean company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Demeo LLP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cassan Maclean company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Demeo LLP company.

In the current year, Cassan Maclean company and Demeo LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cassan Maclean company nor Demeo LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cassan Maclean company nor Demeo LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cassan Maclean company nor Demeo LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Demeo LLP company nor Cassan Maclean company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Demeo LLP nor Cassan Maclean holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Demeo LLP company nor Cassan Maclean company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Demeo LLP company employs more people globally than Cassan Maclean company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Demeo LLP nor Cassan Maclean holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Demeo LLP nor Cassan Maclean holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Demeo LLP nor Cassan Maclean holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Demeo LLP nor Cassan Maclean holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Demeo LLP nor Cassan Maclean holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Demeo LLP nor Cassan Maclean holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X