Comparison Overview

Deluxe Design

VS

Cunneen Signs

Deluxe Design

undefined, Rio Rancho, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Deluxe Design has been creating custom signage for 35 years. We offer turn-key solutions with the help of our incredible staff, starting with our awesome customer service team and featuring our top notch graphic designers, production and skilled install teams. Our state of the art printers and equipment deliver fast and effective results. Enjoy peace of mind knowing that our dedicated teams will meet your deadlines and demonstrate excellence in every project we do.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cunneen Signs

9 Peel Street, HOLROYD, New South Wales, 2142, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Cunneen Signs is a second generation family owned Australian business that has proudly designed, manufactured and installed quality signage since we were established in 1971. Cunneen Signs specialise's in Digital Print, Illuminated, Wayfinding and Directional, Corporate and Council signage, Vehicle and Fleet graphics, Lettering and Engraving as well as Cast Plaques and much more.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/deluxe-design.jpeg
Deluxe Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cunneen-signs.jpeg
Cunneen Signs
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Deluxe Design
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cunneen Signs
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Deluxe Design in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cunneen Signs in 2025.

Incident History — Deluxe Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Deluxe Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cunneen Signs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cunneen Signs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/deluxe-design.jpeg
Deluxe Design
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cunneen-signs.jpeg
Cunneen Signs
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Deluxe Design company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cunneen Signs company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cunneen Signs company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Deluxe Design company.

In the current year, Cunneen Signs company and Deluxe Design company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cunneen Signs company nor Deluxe Design company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cunneen Signs company nor Deluxe Design company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cunneen Signs company nor Deluxe Design company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Deluxe Design company nor Cunneen Signs company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Deluxe Design nor Cunneen Signs holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Deluxe Design company nor Cunneen Signs company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Deluxe Design company employs more people globally than Cunneen Signs company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Deluxe Design nor Cunneen Signs holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Deluxe Design nor Cunneen Signs holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Deluxe Design nor Cunneen Signs holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Deluxe Design nor Cunneen Signs holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Deluxe Design nor Cunneen Signs holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Deluxe Design nor Cunneen Signs holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L