Comparison Overview

Delta Cultural Center

VS

Mission San Luis Archaeological Site

Delta Cultural Center

141 Cherry Street, Helena, 72342, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://deltaculturalcenter.com

The Delta Cultural Center, located in historic downtown Helena, Arkansas, is a state museum of the Department of Arkansas Heritage dedicated to the history of the Arkansas Delta. The DCC researches, documents, interprets and presents the heritage of the people of the Arkansas Delta through exhibits, educational programs, and annual events.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Mission San Luis Archaeological Site

undefined, undefined, undefined, 32304, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.missionsanluis.org

A visit to Mission San Luis transports you back in time. Your destination is a community where Apalachee Indians and newcomers from Spain live in close proximity drawn together by religion as well as military and economic purpose. Modern day visitors to Mission San Luis discover a re-created community where time stands still. There they meet the people of San Luis going about the tasks that sustained life centuries ago. They walk the plaza where the Apalachees played their traditional ball games. They visit the most important structure in the Apalachee village, the council house, and also stop at the home of a colonial Spanish family. Visitors are welcomed at the church built under the supervision of Franciscans, and at the friary where they lived. Mission San Luis is a very special place where history comes to life.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/delta-cultural-center.jpeg
Delta Cultural Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mission-san-luis-archaeological-site.jpeg
Mission San Luis Archaeological Site
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Delta Cultural Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mission San Luis Archaeological Site
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Delta Cultural Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mission San Luis Archaeological Site in 2026.

Incident History — Delta Cultural Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Delta Cultural Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mission San Luis Archaeological Site (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mission San Luis Archaeological Site cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/delta-cultural-center.jpeg
Delta Cultural Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mission-san-luis-archaeological-site.jpeg
Mission San Luis Archaeological Site
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Delta Cultural Center company and Mission San Luis Archaeological Site company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Mission San Luis Archaeological Site company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Delta Cultural Center company.

In the current year, Mission San Luis Archaeological Site company and Delta Cultural Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mission San Luis Archaeological Site company nor Delta Cultural Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mission San Luis Archaeological Site company nor Delta Cultural Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mission San Luis Archaeological Site company nor Delta Cultural Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Delta Cultural Center company nor Mission San Luis Archaeological Site company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Delta Cultural Center nor Mission San Luis Archaeological Site holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Delta Cultural Center company nor Mission San Luis Archaeological Site company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mission San Luis Archaeological Site company employs more people globally than Delta Cultural Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Delta Cultural Center nor Mission San Luis Archaeological Site holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Delta Cultural Center nor Mission San Luis Archaeological Site holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Delta Cultural Center nor Mission San Luis Archaeological Site holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Delta Cultural Center nor Mission San Luis Archaeological Site holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Delta Cultural Center nor Mission San Luis Archaeological Site holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Delta Cultural Center nor Mission San Luis Archaeological Site holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References