Comparison Overview

Delta Cultural Center

VS

Maryland Center for History & Culture

Delta Cultural Center

141 Cherry Street, Helena, 72342, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://deltaculturalcenter.com

The Delta Cultural Center, located in historic downtown Helena, Arkansas, is a state museum of the Department of Arkansas Heritage dedicated to the history of the Arkansas Delta. The DCC researches, documents, interprets and presents the heritage of the people of the Arkansas Delta through exhibits, educational programs, and annual events.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Maryland Center for History & Culture

610 Park Avenue, Baltimore, 21201, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mdhistory.org

The Maryland Center for History and Culture (MCHC), originally founded as the Maryland Historical Society in 1844, is the state’s oldest continuously operating cultural institution. In keeping with the founders’ commitment to preserve the remnants of Maryland’s past, the MCHC remains the premier institution for state history. With over 350,000 objects and seven million books and documents, this institution now serves upward of 100,000 people through its museum, library, press, and educational programs.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/delta-cultural-center.jpeg
Delta Cultural Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maryland-historical-society.jpeg
Maryland Center for History & Culture
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Delta Cultural Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Maryland Center for History & Culture
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Delta Cultural Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Maryland Center for History & Culture in 2026.

Incident History — Delta Cultural Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Delta Cultural Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Maryland Center for History & Culture (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Maryland Center for History & Culture cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/delta-cultural-center.jpeg
Delta Cultural Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maryland-historical-society.jpeg
Maryland Center for History & Culture
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Delta Cultural Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Maryland Center for History & Culture company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Maryland Center for History & Culture company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Delta Cultural Center company.

In the current year, Maryland Center for History & Culture company and Delta Cultural Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Maryland Center for History & Culture company nor Delta Cultural Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Maryland Center for History & Culture company nor Delta Cultural Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Maryland Center for History & Culture company nor Delta Cultural Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Delta Cultural Center company nor Maryland Center for History & Culture company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Delta Cultural Center nor Maryland Center for History & Culture holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Delta Cultural Center company nor Maryland Center for History & Culture company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Maryland Center for History & Culture company employs more people globally than Delta Cultural Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Delta Cultural Center nor Maryland Center for History & Culture holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Delta Cultural Center nor Maryland Center for History & Culture holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Delta Cultural Center nor Maryland Center for History & Culture holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Delta Cultural Center nor Maryland Center for History & Culture holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Delta Cultural Center nor Maryland Center for History & Culture holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Delta Cultural Center nor Maryland Center for History & Culture holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References