Comparison Overview

Defamation Lawyers UK

VS

Russell & Russell Solicitors

Defamation Lawyers UK

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28

At Defamation Lawyers UK we connect victims of defamation to our network of top solicitors to get them the results they deserve. Overtime we have developed strong relationships with our network of solicitors and this gives us the confidence that we can always do what's best for you. The areas we operate in are; Defamation of Character, Breach of Data Protection, Breach of Confidence, Professional Negligence in Defamation, Slander Solicitors, Libel Solicitors and Malicious Falsehood Damage.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Russell & Russell Solicitors

Churchill House, Bolton, BL1 1EE, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Russell & Russell Solicitors has nine offices across the North West region and specialises in: Conveyancing Family law Wills and probate Personal injury Criminal defence Commercial property All Russell & Russell's practice areas hold relevant industry related accreditations as well as the Lexcel Practice Management Standard. The firm also understands that access to justice needs to be on hand around the clock and, as such, is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Russell & Russell's aim is simple; to deliver an excellent standard of legal advice in an efficient and transparent manner.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 138
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defamation-lawyers-uk.jpeg
Defamation Lawyers UK
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rrsolicitors.jpeg
Russell & Russell Solicitors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Defamation Lawyers UK
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Russell & Russell Solicitors
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Defamation Lawyers UK in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Russell & Russell Solicitors in 2025.

Incident History — Defamation Lawyers UK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Defamation Lawyers UK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Russell & Russell Solicitors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Russell & Russell Solicitors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defamation-lawyers-uk.jpeg
Defamation Lawyers UK
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rrsolicitors.jpeg
Russell & Russell Solicitors
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Defamation Lawyers UK company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Russell & Russell Solicitors company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Russell & Russell Solicitors company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Defamation Lawyers UK company.

In the current year, Russell & Russell Solicitors company and Defamation Lawyers UK company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Russell & Russell Solicitors company nor Defamation Lawyers UK company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Russell & Russell Solicitors company nor Defamation Lawyers UK company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Russell & Russell Solicitors company nor Defamation Lawyers UK company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Defamation Lawyers UK company nor Russell & Russell Solicitors company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Defamation Lawyers UK nor Russell & Russell Solicitors holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Defamation Lawyers UK company nor Russell & Russell Solicitors company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Defamation Lawyers UK nor Russell & Russell Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Defamation Lawyers UK nor Russell & Russell Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Defamation Lawyers UK nor Russell & Russell Solicitors holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Defamation Lawyers UK nor Russell & Russell Solicitors holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Defamation Lawyers UK nor Russell & Russell Solicitors holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Defamation Lawyers UK nor Russell & Russell Solicitors holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X