Comparison Overview

Death with Dignity

VS

Arizona Tax Research Association

Death with Dignity

520 SW 6th Avenue, Portland, OR, 97204, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.DeathwithDignity.org

Death with Dignity is a national leader in end-of-life advocacy and policy reform. Our goal is to ensure people with a terminal illness can decide for themselves what a good death means in accordance with their values and beliefs, and that should include having an option for death with dignity. We won’t stop until that is a reality in every part of the United States. We are a 501(c)3, non-partisan, non-profit organization.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Arizona Tax Research Association

1814 W. Washington, Phoenix, AZ, 85007, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 700 and 749
http://www.arizonatax.org/

The Arizona Tax Research Association (ATRA) is the only statewide taxpayer organization representing a cross section of Arizona individuals and businesses. Organized in 1940, ATRA is the largest and most respected independent and accurate source of public finance and tax policy information. ATRA represents taxpayers before policy makers at the state and local level. ATRA's fundamental belief is that every governmental expenditure is directly related to a tax. ATRA's goal is efficient statewide government and the effective use of tax dollars through sound fiscal policies.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/death-with-dignity-national-center.jpeg
Death with Dignity
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arizona-tax-research.jpeg
Arizona Tax Research Association
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Death with Dignity
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Arizona Tax Research Association
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Death with Dignity in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arizona Tax Research Association in 2025.

Incident History — Death with Dignity (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Death with Dignity cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Arizona Tax Research Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arizona Tax Research Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/death-with-dignity-national-center.jpeg
Death with Dignity
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arizona-tax-research.jpeg
Arizona Tax Research Association
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Arizona Tax Research Association company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Death with Dignity company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Arizona Tax Research Association company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Death with Dignity company.

In the current year, Arizona Tax Research Association company and Death with Dignity company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Arizona Tax Research Association company nor Death with Dignity company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Arizona Tax Research Association company nor Death with Dignity company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Arizona Tax Research Association company nor Death with Dignity company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Death with Dignity company nor Arizona Tax Research Association company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Death with Dignity nor Arizona Tax Research Association holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Death with Dignity company nor Arizona Tax Research Association company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Death with Dignity company employs more people globally than Arizona Tax Research Association company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Death with Dignity nor Arizona Tax Research Association holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Death with Dignity nor Arizona Tax Research Association holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Death with Dignity nor Arizona Tax Research Association holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Death with Dignity nor Arizona Tax Research Association holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Death with Dignity nor Arizona Tax Research Association holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Death with Dignity nor Arizona Tax Research Association holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References