Comparison Overview

Deakin University

VS

Georgia State University

Deakin University

221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, victoria, AU, 3125
Last Update: 2026-01-19
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.deakin.edu.au/

Deakin’s unique identity – rooted in balanced excellence in education and research – has been driving lasting change for a better future since 1974. Over our 50+ year history, Deakin has grown to be one of the top universities worldwide with a truly global presence. Our passion and commitment to teaching, research and student success is recognised by local and international ranking bodies and our students. Turning 50 is a key milestone for the Deakin community. We’re transitioning from a young University to a more established institution that’s turning ideas into impact. #1 Victorian uni for graduate employment, Course Satisfaction & Student Support #2 Victorian uni for research quality Registered Australian University CRICOS No: 00113B

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 10,793
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Georgia State University

33 Gilmer St. SE, Atlanta, GA, US, 30303
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gsu.edu

Georgia State is an urban public research university and national model for student success in Atlanta, the cultural and economic center of the Southeast. The largest university in the state and one of the largest in the nation, Georgia State provides its faculty and more than 51,000 students with unsurpassed access to opportunities in one of America's great global cities. Over a period of 10 years, the university raised graduation rates 22 percentage points and eliminated students achievement gaps based on race, ethnicity or income. Its Atlanta Campus offers more than 250 degree programs in 100 fields of study at the bachelor's, master's, specialist and doctoral levels. Home to more freshmen than any other college or university in Georgia, the university's Perimeter College provides more than 30 associate degree pathways at five campuses throughout metro Atlanta.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 12,662
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/deakin-university.jpeg
Deakin University
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/georgiastateuniversity.jpeg
Georgia State University
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Deakin University
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Georgia State University
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Deakin University in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Georgia State University in 2026.

Incident History — Deakin University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Deakin University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Georgia State University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Georgia State University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/deakin-university.jpeg
Deakin University
Incidents

Date Detected: 07/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/georgiastateuniversity.jpeg
Georgia State University
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Georgia State University company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Deakin University company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Deakin University company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Georgia State University company has not reported any.

In the current year, Georgia State University company and Deakin University company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Georgia State University company nor Deakin University company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Deakin University company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Georgia State University company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Georgia State University company nor Deakin University company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Deakin University company nor Georgia State University company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Deakin University nor Georgia State University holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Georgia State University company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Deakin University company.

Georgia State University company employs more people globally than Deakin University company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither Deakin University nor Georgia State University holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Deakin University nor Georgia State University holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Deakin University nor Georgia State University holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Deakin University nor Georgia State University holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Deakin University nor Georgia State University holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Deakin University nor Georgia State University holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References