Comparison Overview

Deacons

VS

Corporate Litigation Advisors

Deacons

5th Floor, Alexandra House, Central, Hong Kong, undefined, HK
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Deacons is Hong Kong's premier independent firm. We provide an extensive range of legal and commercial services to local and international corporations. With 170 years of experience in providing legal services, our clients are assured of the integrity and stability of one of the region's longest-established and most respected law firms. Beyond the firm's headquarters in Hong Kong, Deacons has established three representative offices in Mainland China, ensuring we are conveniently located to provide market-sensitive legal advice. Our principal service areas include: Banking & Finance, Capital Markets, China Trade & Investment, Competition, Construction, Corporate and M&A, Corporate Services, Data Protection & Privacy, Employment & Pensions, Family Law, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Intellectual Property, Investment Funds, Litigation & Dispute Resolution, Private Clients, Real Estate and Regulatory.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 533
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Corporate Litigation Advisors

16301 Quorum Drive, Addison, Texas, 75001, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Corporate Litigation Advisors (CLA) is a dispute resolution company. Founded over ten years ago by Jim Shields, CLA has helped dozens of medium-sized businesses navigate their detrimental litigation issues. CLA's process-orient approach develops a sound budget, a realistic time frame, and the best possible resolution. CLA has earned the continued trust of its clients by focusing on active communication and strategic development throughout every stage of litigation. The firm is located in Addison, a major business hub of the North Dallas area.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/deacons.jpeg
Deacons
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/corporate-litigation-advisors.jpeg
Corporate Litigation Advisors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Deacons
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Corporate Litigation Advisors
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Deacons in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Corporate Litigation Advisors in 2025.

Incident History — Deacons (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Deacons cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Corporate Litigation Advisors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Corporate Litigation Advisors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/deacons.jpeg
Deacons
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/corporate-litigation-advisors.jpeg
Corporate Litigation Advisors
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Deacons company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Corporate Litigation Advisors company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Corporate Litigation Advisors company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Deacons company.

In the current year, Corporate Litigation Advisors company and Deacons company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Corporate Litigation Advisors company nor Deacons company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Corporate Litigation Advisors company nor Deacons company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Corporate Litigation Advisors company nor Deacons company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Deacons company nor Corporate Litigation Advisors company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Deacons nor Corporate Litigation Advisors holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Deacons company nor Corporate Litigation Advisors company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Deacons company employs more people globally than Corporate Litigation Advisors company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Deacons nor Corporate Litigation Advisors holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Deacons nor Corporate Litigation Advisors holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Deacons nor Corporate Litigation Advisors holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Deacons nor Corporate Litigation Advisors holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Deacons nor Corporate Litigation Advisors holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Deacons nor Corporate Litigation Advisors holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X