Comparison Overview

Deaconess Health System

VS

Heywood Healthcare

Deaconess Health System

600 Mary Street, Evansville, 47747, US
Last Update: 2026-04-04
Between 650 and 699

Deaconess Health System is the premiere provider of health care services to a population of more than 1.5 million in southwestern Indiana, western Kentucky and southeastern Illinois.  Serving a population of more than 1.5 million residents, the system consists of 20 wholly owned, joint ventured, sponsored or affiliated hospital locations situated throughout the Tri-State.  Deaconess Health System is the largest employer in the tri-state region, and operates under the direction of a local board, with a local focus. Deaconess is widely recognized for its commitment to excellence. Named the #2 Hospital in Indiana by US News & World Report for the past six years, Deaconess was also named to the Forbes list of America’s Best Employers in 2022 and 2023, 2024 and 2025. As our organization continues to grow and expand, we welcome skilled, dedicated and compassionate individuals to join us in delivering The Deaconess Difference: putting people at the center of everything we do, making a positive difference in the lives of our patients, families, employees and community. Browse our site to learn more about our convenient locations, expert services, community involvement, and much more.  Our commitment to progressive, patient-centered care guides our work every day as our priorities are set and decisions are made with a local focus and direction.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 4,101
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Heywood Healthcare

242 Green Street, Gardner, 01440 , US
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 700 and 749

Heywood Healthcare is an independent community healthcare system serving north central Massachusetts and southern New Hampshire. It is comprised of Heywood Hospital, a 134-bed acute care community non-profit hospital in Gardner, MA; Athol Hospital, a 25-bed not-for-profit, Critical Access Hospital in Athol, MA and Heywood Medical Group, with primary care physicians and specialists located throughout the region. Heywood Medical Group includes multiple satellite facilities throughout the region: Ashburnham Family Medicine, Heywood Rehabilitation Center, Summit Family Medicine, Main Street Primary Care & Heywood Urgent Care in Gardner, the Winchendon Health Center & Murdock School-based Health Center in Winchendon, Athol Primary Care, Tully Family Medicine and Walk-In Care in Athol, and ACES School Based Health Center, in Athol. For more information, visit www.heywood.org.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 465
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/deaconess-health-system.jpeg
Deaconess Health System
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/heywoodhealthcare.jpeg
Heywood Healthcare
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Deaconess Health System
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Heywood Healthcare
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

Deaconess Health System has 28.57% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Heywood Healthcare in 2026.

Incident History — Deaconess Health System (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Deaconess Health System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Heywood Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Heywood Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/deaconess-health-system.jpeg
Deaconess Health System
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized access to cloud-based file-sharing platform
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 04/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/heywoodhealthcare.jpeg
Heywood Healthcare
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Heywood Healthcare company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Deaconess Health System company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Deaconess Health System company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Heywood Healthcare company.

In the current year, Deaconess Health System company has reported more cyber incidents than Heywood Healthcare company.

Neither Heywood Healthcare company nor Deaconess Health System company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Deaconess Health System company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Heywood Healthcare company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Heywood Healthcare company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Deaconess Health System company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Deaconess Health System company nor Heywood Healthcare company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Deaconess Health System nor Heywood Healthcare holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Deaconess Health System company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Heywood Healthcare company.

Deaconess Health System company employs more people globally than Heywood Healthcare company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Deaconess Health System nor Heywood Healthcare holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Deaconess Health System nor Heywood Healthcare holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Deaconess Health System nor Heywood Healthcare holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Deaconess Health System nor Heywood Healthcare holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Deaconess Health System nor Heywood Healthcare holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Deaconess Health System nor Heywood Healthcare holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H